Re: [Bacula-users] LTO-2 tape life spans and drive life spans

2007-02-01 Thread Don MacArthur
Thanks Michael, You answered the usage question. With the exception of positioning at times when the tape is faster than the data stream, the tape is only making one pass over the heads per day. I wouldn't consider the level of use you're describing as significant, at least not in my experienc

Re: [Bacula-users] LTO-2 tape life spans and drive life spans

2007-02-01 Thread Michael Morgan
I appreciate your feedback. The daily tapes are written to 12 times each day (full and incrementals on the same tape), and each daily tape is used once each week. There are also weekly tapes that are written to once and used once/month, and a monthly pool that is written to each month, with the

Re: [Bacula-users] LTO-2 tape life spans and drive life spans

2007-02-01 Thread Don MacArthur
[I just re-read this and it sounds gruff. I'm just in a hurry, I do sympathize with you. Read this with a helpful tone, which is how it's intended. Thx] You say how many jobs run each day, but not how many tapes are written. In this case, the number of tapes is more relevant than the number of

[Bacula-users] LTO-2 tape life spans and drive life spans

2007-02-01 Thread Michael Morgan
First of all, let me just say that Bacula is wonderful. I migrated to it after a very unreliable (and expensive) commercial product implementation. Bacula works flawlessly, and is very simple to configure and operate. Great product! Keep up the good work. Now for my question: Does anyone have