Re: [Bacula-users] Improving job scheduling flexibility

2008-02-25 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Monday 25 February 2008 18.47:50 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > In the message dated: Sat, 23 Feb 2008 12:40:43 +0100, > Kern Sibbald used the subject line > <[Bacula-users] Improving job scheduling flexibility> > and wrote: > > => Hello, > => > => As

Re: [Bacula-users] Improving job scheduling flexibility

2008-02-25 Thread mark . bergman
In the message dated: Sat, 23 Feb 2008 12:40:43 +0100, Kern Sibbald used the subject line <[Bacula-users] Improving job scheduling flexibility> and wrote: => Hello, => => As you know, current job scheduling has a few deficiencies, particular if for => some reaso

Re: [Bacula-users] Improving job scheduling flexibility

2008-02-23 Thread Marc Schiffbauer
* Kern Sibbald schrieb am 23.02.08 um 12:40 Uhr: > Hello, Hi Kern, > > As you know, current job scheduling has a few deficiencies, particular if for > some reason your backups get blocked (a bad tape driver or operator > intervention required), which can lead to a big pile of duplicate jobs be

[Bacula-users] Improving job scheduling flexibility

2008-02-23 Thread Kern Sibbald
Hello, As you know, current job scheduling has a few deficiencies, particular if for some reason your backups get blocked (a bad tape driver or operator intervention required), which can lead to a big pile of duplicate jobs being scheduled. We have previously discussed ways of fixing this, wit