Re: [Bacula-users] Important Bacula Status Report -- second version

> On Apr 15, 2015, at 10:23 AM, Raymond Burns Jr. > wrote: > > 1. I think this is good news. Not really sure. Sounds to me as work will > continue as normal, with the possible assistance from another Bacula > maintainer for binaries. > 2. This is where I have question

Re: [Bacula-users] Important Bacula Status Report -- second version

Hello, Well, I cannot be so impolite and tell you that you are way off :-) However, please see below ... On 15.04.2015 15:23, Raymond Burns Jr. wrote: 1. I think this is good news. Not really sure. Sounds to me as work

Re: [Bacula-users] Important Bacula Status Report -- second version

1. I think this is good news. Not really sure. Sounds to me as work will continue as normal, with the possible assistance from another Bacula maintainer for binaries. 2. This is where I have questions. Assuming the FSFE was the legal protection during the Barios lawsuit, the final outcome was not 1

[Bacula-users] Important Bacula Status Report -- second version

Hello, I would like to discuss the following topics: 1. Bacula Release Status 2. The FSFE and licenses 1. Bacula Release Status As probably know, the latest release of Bacula is 7.0.5. This release has proved quite stable but there are a few bugs open on it, and I am working on them. I am al