Re: [Bacula-users] IPv6 bug - was RE: Windows client firewalling problem

2009-12-22 Thread John Drescher
>> I believe a few weeks ago someone on the list had a similar problem >> with ipv6 and a macintosh. They figured it out though. >> > > Ah, I must have missed that. In any case, I had overlooked that Bacula for > Linux actually does support IPv6. I'll update the bug report later today, too > (the

Re: [Bacula-users] IPv6 bug - was RE: Windows client firewalling problem

2009-12-22 Thread Kevin Keane
> -Original Message- > From: John Drescher [mailto:dresche...@gmail.com] > Sent: Tuesday, December 22, 2009 6:45 AM > To: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] IPv6 bug - was RE: Windows client > firewalling problem > > 2009/12/22 Kevin

Re: [Bacula-users] IPv6 bug - was RE: Windows client firewalling problem

2009-12-22 Thread John Drescher
2009/12/22 Kevin Keane : > I found the problem; in case somebody else runs into this and finds this > post, here is the solution: > > > > There seems to be a bug in bacula (3.0.x) related to IPv6. It only listens > on IPv4, but establishes connections on IPv6 if an record is present > (bacula

[Bacula-users] IPv6 bug - was RE: Windows client firewalling problem

2009-12-22 Thread Kevin Keane
I found the problem; in case somebody else runs into this and finds this post, here is the solution: There seems to be a bug in bacula (3.0.x) related to IPv6. It only listens on IPv4, but establishes connections on IPv6 if an record is present (bacula bug report is filed with details). Th