Re: [Bacula-users] Git repo down?

2017-01-02 Thread Richard
> Date: Monday, January 02, 2017 11:03:11 + > From: Michael Munger > > All: > > Seems the git repo is down? > > git clone http://git.bacula.org/bacula gives the following error: > > Fatal: repository 'http://git.bacula.org/bacula' not found. > > This started after Kern (I think) did an u

Re: [Bacula-users] Git repo down?

2017-01-02 Thread Roberts, Ben
Hi Michael, > Fatal: repository 'http://git.bacula.org/bacula' not found. Add ".git" to the end of your clone URL: http://git.bacula.org/bacula.git Regards, Ben Roberts This email and any files transmitted with it contain confidential and proprietary information and is solely for the use of the

[Bacula-users] Git repo down?

2017-01-02 Thread Michael Munger
All: Seems the git repo is down? git clone http://git.bacula.org/bacula gives the following error: Fatal: repository 'http://git.bacula.org/bacula' not found. This started after Kern (I think) did an update to the website. Michael Munger, dCAP, MCPS, MCNPS, MBSS High Powered Help, Inc. Microso

Re: [Bacula-users] git repo down?

2016-12-27 Thread Kern Sibbald
Hello, No, the git repo is up and available.  I access it directly with ssh, so didn't notice that it was not available through http.  That is because the Apache configuration for git was contained in a vhost_old_bacula.org ... so I forgot to implement it. 

[Bacula-users] git repo down?

2016-12-26 Thread Michael Munger
Seems that the git repo is down? root@backup-server:/usr/src# git clone http://git.bacula.org/bacula Cloning into 'bacula'... fatal: repository 'http://git.bacula.org/bacula/' not found when I navigate to it in a browser, the bacula.org CMS says page not found? -- Michael Munger, dCAP, MCPS, MC

[Bacula-users] Git repo

2012-06-11 Thread Kern Sibbald
Hello, In looking at how to back out a bad community patch that I put into Bacula 5.2.8, I decided to reset the repo and to prior to that patch, because for me it was by far the simplest thing to do. The consequence is that for any of you who checked out or updated the database after 5.2.8 was re