Re: [Bacula-users] Fwd: maximum concurrent job not functioning as expected

2009-09-29 Thread John Drescher
> Does it mean that even though i have two separate NAS defined in the > bacula-sd.conf -- but through one SD, there will be only one job running at > any given time? If so, should I be running multiple SDs on the same box to > have concurrent jobs? My initial understanding was that since they are

Re: [Bacula-users] Fwd: maximum concurrent job not functioning as expected

2009-09-29 Thread John Drescher
> please check the attached image: you mean that, to have sd1 and sd2 working > in concurrency, we must only use pool 1 and not pool 2 (modifying the pool > of changer connected to sd2 to pool 1)? > Your example should allow pool1 and pool2 to run concurrently. John -

Re: [Bacula-users] Fwd: maximum concurrent job not functioning as expected

2009-09-29 Thread Massimo Cavallini
Hi John, please check the attached image: you mean that, to have sd1 and sd2 working in concurrency, we must only use pool 1 and not pool 2 (modifying the pool of changer connected to sd2 to pool 1)? Thank you. Kindest regards Max <> On Sep 28, 2009, at 11:10 PM, John Drescher w

[Bacula-users] Fwd: maximum concurrent job not functioning as expected

2009-09-28 Thread John Drescher
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 4:48 PM, Free BSD wrote: > John Drescher wrote: >> On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 1:46 PM, Free BSD wrote: >> >>> Dear List Members >>> >>> I have Bacula up and running, which is working fine, except for one issue. >>> >>> >> Are all jobs going to the same pool. Remember bacula c