> Specifically the tape will probably have been removed without being rewound
> first.
> We use our tape robots for a variety of functions, ingesting data from
> clients, backups and archive cycles. This just has never come up before.
>
I am confused. You can not remove an LTO tape without rewindi
> The key info here is the "BLOCKED" on the drive. The tape may be there,
> but bacula cannot complete the mount operation. I've had similar
> situations. Within bconsole or bat, work with the unmount, release, and
> mount commands. It may take a couple of passes to get that "BLOCKED"
> removed
On 9/7/12 7:51 AM, "John Drescher" wrote:
>-- Forwarded message --
>From: Chris Ord
>Date: Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 11:10 PM
>Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] bacula possibly confused about label
>To: John Drescher
>
>
>John,
>that is the confusing part(see bold)
>
>Device "Drive_0" (/de
-- Forwarded message --
From: Chris Ord
Date: Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 11:10 PM
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] bacula possibly confused about label
To: John Drescher
John,
that is the confusing part(see bold)
Device "Drive_0" (/dev/nst0) open but no Bacula volume is currently mounted.
