Re: [Bacula-users] FreeBSD bat port - working

2007-09-24 Thread Dan Langille
On 16 Sep 2007 at 21:45, Dan Langille wrote: > I am happy to say that I just ran bat on my laptop. There are many > people who helped me get this going. > > The FreeBSD port still requires some work before it can be committed > to the ports tree. In particular, the dependencies need work and

Re: [Bacula-users] FreeBSD bat port - working

2007-09-17 Thread Silver Salonen
On Monday 17 September 2007 09:58, Silver Salonen wrote: > On Monday 17 September 2007 04:45, Dan Langille wrote: > > I am happy to say that I just ran bat on my laptop. There are many > > people who helped me get this going. > > > > The FreeBSD port still requires some work before it can be com

Re: [Bacula-users] FreeBSD bat port - working

2007-09-16 Thread Silver Salonen
On Monday 17 September 2007 04:45, Dan Langille wrote: > I am happy to say that I just ran bat on my laptop. There are many > people who helped me get this going. > > The FreeBSD port still requires some work before it can be committed > to the ports tree. In particular, the dependencies need

[Bacula-users] FreeBSD bat port - working

2007-09-16 Thread Dan Langille
I am happy to say that I just ran bat on my laptop. There are many people who helped me get this going. The FreeBSD port still requires some work before it can be committed to the ports tree. In particular, the dependencies need work and the pkg-plist is all wrong and bat is not actually inst