Re: [Bacula-users] FreeBSD and Authochangers

2007-06-25 Thread Ken Gunderson
On Mon, 25 Jun 2007 15:19:06 +0200 Rudolf Cejka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Bill Moran wrote (2007/06/25): > > > i am using freebsd 6.2 with mtx-changer and barcodes and its all fine > > > (the only one problem was with access for bacula to autochenger node in > > > /dev) > > > autochanger is Qua

Re: [Bacula-users] FreeBSD and Authochangers

2007-06-25 Thread Atom Powers
I'm using both with a StorageTek (Sun) L40 library. I use the chio-changer inside Bacula and mtx from the CLI. ( Although, iir I had to make some changes to the chio script before it would work correctly. ) I have also used the mtx script with bacula, and I /know/ I had to modify that one. P.S. F

Re: [Bacula-users] FreeBSD and Authochangers

2007-06-25 Thread Rudolf Cejka
Bill Moran wrote (2007/06/25): > > i am using freebsd 6.2 with mtx-changer and barcodes and its all fine > > (the only one problem was with access for bacula to autochenger node in > > /dev) > > autochanger is Quantum superloader 3 > We're using chio-changer with FreeBSD 6 and a Dell LTO2 drive. W

Re: [Bacula-users] FreeBSD and Authochangers

2007-06-25 Thread Bill Moran
In response to tomasz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Ken Gunderson wrote: > > Hello List: > > > > I've posted before regarding chio vs mtx-changer and got reply from Arno > > but I'd love to hear from some FreeBSD users who are using > > authochangers. So here goes again... > > > > Are you using chio o

Re: [Bacula-users] FreeBSD and Authochangers

2007-06-24 Thread Ken Gunderson
On Sun, 24 Jun 2007 18:12:59 -0600 Ken Gunderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, 24 Jun 2007 22:06:38 +0100 > tomasz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Ken Gunderson wrote: > > > Hello List: > > > > > > I've posted before regarding chio vs mtx-changer and got reply from Arno > > > but I'd lov

Re: [Bacula-users] FreeBSD and Authochangers

2007-06-24 Thread Ken Gunderson
On Sun, 24 Jun 2007 22:06:38 +0100 tomasz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ken Gunderson wrote: > > Hello List: > > > > I've posted before regarding chio vs mtx-changer and got reply from Arno > > but I'd love to hear from some FreeBSD users who are using > > authochangers. So here goes again... > >

Re: [Bacula-users] FreeBSD and Authochangers

2007-06-24 Thread tomasz
Ken Gunderson wrote: > Hello List: > > I've posted before regarding chio vs mtx-changer and got reply from Arno > but I'd love to hear from some FreeBSD users who are using > authochangers. So here goes again... > > Are you using chio or mtx-changer, and why? I've looked at the chio > example s

[Bacula-users] FreeBSD and Authochangers

2007-06-24 Thread Ken Gunderson
Hello List: I've posted before regarding chio vs mtx-changer and got reply from Arno but I'd love to hear from some FreeBSD users who are using authochangers. So here goes again... Are you using chio or mtx-changer, and why? I've looked at the chio example scripts and seems that chio-bacula sim