Phil Stracchino wrote:
> On 03/08/10 13:32, Jesper Krogh wrote:
>> Phil Stracchino wrote:
>>> If the problem still occurs, something else is going on. But this
>>> should fix the problem in probably >99% of cases in which the 50-second
>>> timeout is only infrequently being exceeded.
>> It hugely
On 03/08/10 13:32, Jesper Krogh wrote:
> Phil Stracchino wrote:
>> If the problem still occurs, something else is going on. But this
>> should fix the problem in probably >99% of cases in which the 50-second
>> timeout is only infrequently being exceeded.
>
> It hugely depends on your fileset siz
Phil Stracchino wrote:
> If the problem still occurs, something else is going on. But this
> should fix the problem in probably >99% of cases in which the 50-second
> timeout is only infrequently being exceeded.
It hugely depends on your fileset sizes.. I have some in the order of
10m records.. a
>From a routine weekly differential of a Windows 2000 client (Director
and Catalog on a multicore Solaris 10 x86 server) with Bacula 3.0.3
running against MySQL 5.1:
08-Mar 03:47 babylon4-sd JobId 1398: Job write elapsed time = 00:08:54,
Transfer rate = 2.641 M
+bytes/second
08-Mar 03:49 babylon4
