On Tue, 2009-06-23 at 21:52 +0200, Arno Lehmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 23.06.2009 17:04, Dirk Bartley wrote:
> > Sure, iptables allows for connection based rules as well as the old
> > ipchains style rules based rules.
> >
> > So your probably using connection based rules like :
> > iptables -A INPUT
On Tue, 2009-06-23 at 21:52 +0200, Arno Lehmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 23.06.2009 17:04, Dirk Bartley wrote:
> > Sure, iptables allows for connection based rules as well as the old
> > ipchains style rules based rules.
> >
> > So your probably using connection based rules like :
> > iptables -A INPUT
Hi,
23.06.2009 17:04, Dirk Bartley wrote:
> Sure, iptables allows for connection based rules as well as the old
> ipchains style rules based rules.
>
> So your probably using connection based rules like :
> iptables -A INPUT -p tcp -m state --state ESTABLISHED -j ACCEPT
> iptables -A OUTPUT -p
Sure, iptables allows for connection based rules as well as the old
ipchains style rules based rules.
So your probably using connection based rules like :
iptables -A INPUT -p tcp -m state --state ESTABLISHED -j ACCEPT
iptables -A OUTPUT -p tcp -m state --state NEW,ESTABLISHED -j ACCEPT
just ad
Greetings
Moved a machine into a dmz behind a pix515e firewall. Created a rule to
allow the fd to connect to the sd and it seems to work, except for one
little peculiarity on a larger backup job.
On a server that backs up about 60GB, it fails at the very tail end of
the backup. The firewall log
