On Friday 11 November 2005 10:15, Stephan Ebelt wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Kern Sibbald wrote:
> [...]
>
> >>That said, once you prooved that your fileset works, it would be a good
> >>contribution to the manual.
> >
> > I agee with Arno. Your approach is the best one I have seen, and would
> > be a nice
Hello,
Kern Sibbald wrote:
[...]
That said, once you prooved that your fileset works, it would be a good
contribution to the manual.
I agee with Arno. Your approach is the best one I have seen, and would be a
nice contribution to the manual.
last night all went just fine with this FileSet
Kern Sibbald wrote:
That said, once you prooved that your fileset works, it would be a good
contribution to the manual.
I agee with Arno. Your approach is the best one I have seen, and would be a
nice contribution to the manual.
ok, last night all jobs ran and it looks good. All finished
If the crash is because of changing schedules and reloading, or reloading and
scheduled jobs start, then it crashes, there is no need to debug it. I
understand what the problem is for bug #375, but it is a non-trivial fix that
is going to have to wait a bit ...
On Wednesday 09 November 2005 16:
Stephan Ebelt wrote:
[...]
The job didn't run because bacula seems to have crashed. I've got no
glue why yet. All I found till now is
- no director process was running this morning
- none of the scheduled jobs did run as I've got not a single e-mail
- the message below appears in the .conmsg
Hello.
Kern Sibbald wrote:
Quite possible, considering the number of possible ways to use options
blocks in filesets. I fact I suspect that Kern himself doesn't fully
understand the implications of options with includes and exludes and REs
and whatnotelse ;-)
Yes, Arno is correct :-)
does
Hello,
Arno Lehmann wrote:
SITUATION
There are multiple clients and I like to have one fileset for all
of them. As they are quite similar. Each one looks like
/u01 /u02 ... /u09 /u10 ... /uNN
Interesting setup...
it is actually what oracle recommends to mount data disks. Not sure if
they s
On Tuesday 08 November 2005 21:01, Arno Lehmann wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On 08.11.2005 18:06, Stephan Ebelt wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I do not have a problem in the sense that something does not work - I
> > just would like to hear some opinions as I am not sure how fool proof my
> > solution is:
>
> I
Hello,
On 08.11.2005 18:06, Stephan Ebelt wrote:
Hello,
I do not have a problem in the sense that something does not work - I
just would like to hear some opinions as I am not sure how fool proof my
solution is:
I *love* fool proof solutions :-)
SITUATION
There are multiple clients and
Hello,
I do not have a problem in the sense that something does not work - I
just would like to hear some opinions as I am not sure how fool proof my
solution is:
SITUATION
There are multiple clients and I like to have one fileset for all of
them. As they are quite similar. Each one looks l
10 matches
Mail list logo
