;
> To: "bacula-users"
> Sent: Tuesday, February 7, 2012 12:24:20 PM
> Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] FD behind NAT
>
> As you already said, you could use a site-to-site vpn. I don't know your
> network, but if a non-openvpn site-to-site vpn would works, I guess you
go.
Thank you again.
- Original Message -
From: "Julian Fahrer"
To: "bacula-users"
Sent: Tuesday, February 7, 2012 12:24:20 PM
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] FD behind NAT
As you already said, you could use a site-to-site vpn. I don't know your
network, but if a
Hi!
With *nix machines you can use a sshtunnel!
http://wiki.bacula.org/doku.php?id=sshtunnel
Working for me in three vps servers flawessly!
J.
2012/2/7 Christopher Geegan :
> Forgive me if this has been asked and answered.
>
> I have a client (FD) behind NAT and I am look for ways to initiate b
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 12:55 PM, Christopher Geegan
wrote:
> Forgive me if this has been asked and answered.
>
> I have a client (FD) behind NAT and I am look for ways to initiate backup
> jobs from the server without port forwarding on the client side.
>
> I have read numerous articles of how to
14 to 192.168.0.4
...
Personally I would definitely recommend a site-to-site vpn!
Kind regards
Julian
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Christopher Geegan [mailto:cgee...@infosecur.biz]
Gesendet: Dienstag, 7. Februar 2012 18:56
An: bacula-users
Betreff: [Bacula-users] FD behind NAT
Forgive me if
Forgive me if this has been asked and answered.
I have a client (FD) behind NAT and I am look for ways to initiate backup jobs
from the server without port forwarding on the client side.
I have read numerous articles of how to resolve issues with the server (DIR/SD)
being behind NAT but to me t
