Re: [Bacula-users] Encryption slow down

2010-03-31 Thread Steve Polyack
On 03/31/10 10:39, Josh Fisher wrote: > On 3/30/2010 5:44 PM, William Taylor wrote: > >> Before enabling encryption we were getting 118 - 120 MBs throughput to our >> LTO-4 tape drive. >> With encryption turned on we get 38-39MBs throughput. bacula process is at >> 98 - 100 % cpu while runnin

Re: [Bacula-users] Encryption slow down

2010-03-31 Thread Josh Fisher
On 3/30/2010 5:44 PM, William Taylor wrote: > Before enabling encryption we were getting 118 - 120 MBs throughput to our > LTO-4 tape drive. > With encryption turned on we get 38-39MBs throughput. bacula process is at 98 > - 100 % cpu while running. > I tried cutting the key size down to 472bits

[Bacula-users] Encryption slow down

2010-03-30 Thread William Taylor
Before enabling encryption we were getting 118 - 120 MBs throughput to our LTO-4 tape drive. With encryption turned on we get 38-39MBs throughput. bacula process is at 98 - 100 % cpu while running. I tried cutting the key size down to 472bits from 2048bits but it didn't make a difference. The ma