Daniel Bareiro wrote:
> On Wednesday, 25 March 2009 22:52:03 -0400,
> John Drescher wrote:
>
>
So the tapes can only be manually recycle must be 'Recycle = no' in
the pool definition and that flag 'recycled' in each volume must be
zero?
>
>
>>> AutoPrune = no
>>>
Daniel Bareiro wrote:
> I was reading the 'catalog maintenance' chapter in order to understand a
> little more on the operation of File Retention and Job Retention. But
> something is not to me clear still. Beyond what is due to maintain the
> rule File Retention < Job Retention < Volume Retention,
2009/3/28 Daniel Bareiro :
> On Wednesday, 25 March 2009 22:52:03 -0400,
> John Drescher wrote:
>
>> >> So the tapes can only be manually recycle must be 'Recycle = no' in
>> >> the pool definition and that flag 'recycled' in each volume must be
>> >> zero?
>
>> > AutoPrune = no
>> > Recycle = no
>
On Wednesday, 25 March 2009 22:52:03 -0400,
John Drescher wrote:
> >> So the tapes can only be manually recycle must be 'Recycle = no' in
> >> the pool definition and that flag 'recycled' in each volume must be
> >> zero?
> > AutoPrune = no
> > Recycle = no
> > In the pool should be enough.
> > h
Hi Kevin.
On Wednesday, 25 March 2009 20:08:01 -0700,
Kevin Keane wrote:
> If you want tapes around forever, I think your best bet is to change
> the retention time in the pool to, say, ten years (I'm not sure if you
> can do an infinite retention time off the top of my head). Usually, if
> bacul
If you want tapes around forever, I think your best bet is to change the
retention time in the pool to, say, ten years (I'm not sure if you can
do an infinite retention time off the top of my head). Usually, if
bacula can manage something, why would you want to do it manually?
That said, to ans
> "subscription" == Kevin Keane writes:
> If you want tapes around forever, I think your
> best bet is to change the retention time in the
> pool to, say, ten years (I'm not sure if you
> can do an infinite retention time off the top
> of my head). Usually, if bacula can m
2009/3/25 Daniel Bareiro :
> Hi all!
>
> I have the following doubt that I would like to know if you could
> clarify to me. I have a tape group from full pool that was not on in
> tape library and Bacula turn it to 'purged' state. This means that if I
> return the tapes again to the jukebox then I
If you want tapes around forever, I think your best bet is to change the
retention time in the pool to, say, ten years (I'm not sure if you can
do an infinite retention time off the top of my head). Usually, if
bacula can manage something, why would you want to do it manually?
That said, to ans
If you want tapes around forever, I think your best bet is to change the
retention time in the pool to, say, ten years (I'm not sure if you can
do an infinite retention time off the top of my head). Usually, if
bacula can manage something, why would you want to do it manually?
That said, to ans
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 10:44 PM, John Drescher wrote:
> 2009/3/25 Daniel Bareiro :
>> Hi all!
>>
>> I have the following doubt that I would like to know if you could
>> clarify to me. I have a tape group from full pool that was not on in
>> tape library and Bacula turn it to 'purged' state. This
Hi all!
I have the following doubt that I would like to know if you could
clarify to me. I have a tape group from full pool that was not on in
tape library and Bacula turn it to 'purged' state. This means that if I
return the tapes again to the jukebox then I could not recover what they
contain?
12 matches
Mail list logo
