James Chamberlain writes:
> On Tue, 14 Apr 2009, Martin Simmons wrote:
>> I'm not sure if it will work, but you could try using symbolic
>> links from one file system to the volumes on the other file
>> system(s)?
>
> Thanks for the suggestion, and I considered it, but I don't think
> it'll work.
> Is it possible to switch to this approach without dumping my existing
> backups and starting over from scratch?
>
I believe you can do this. But agian this approach would be work and
experimentation on your part because this customization is not in
bacula. This may be something that you can get f
> On Tue, 14 Apr 2009 07:54:51 -0400 (EDT), James Chamberlain said:
>
> On Tue, 14 Apr 2009, Martin Simmons wrote:
>
> >> On Mon, 13 Apr 2009 17:41:00 -0400, James Chamberlain said:
> >>
> >> The basic problem for me is that I've hit the 8 TB file system size
> >> limit with ext3, and I d
On Apr 14, 2009, at 10:04 AM, Josh Fisher wrote:
> James Chamberlain wrote:
>> On Tue, 14 Apr 2009, Martin Simmons wrote:
On Mon, 13 Apr 2009 17:41:00 -0400, James Chamberlain said:
The basic problem for me is that I've hit the 8 TB file system size
limit with ext3, and
James Chamberlain wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Apr 2009, Martin Simmons wrote:
>
>
>>> On Mon, 13 Apr 2009 17:41:00 -0400, James Chamberlain said:
>>>
>>> The basic problem for me is that I've hit the 8 TB file system size
>>> limit with ext3, and I don't have ext4 available to me
On Tue, 14 Apr 2009, Martin Simmons wrote:
>> On Mon, 13 Apr 2009 17:41:00 -0400, James Chamberlain said:
>>
>> The basic problem for me is that I've hit the 8 TB file system size
>> limit with ext3, and I don't have ext4 available to me yet. With tape
>> libraries, you can keep adding more t
> On Mon, 13 Apr 2009 17:41:00 -0400, James Chamberlain said:
>
> The basic problem for me is that I've hit the 8 TB file system size
> limit with ext3, and I don't have ext4 available to me yet. With tape
> libraries, you can keep adding more tapes to increase the size of your
> pool.
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 6:02 PM, James Chamberlain wrote:
>>> Why would you ever want such a pool? The only reason I can think of is
>>> if
>>> you have more pools than backup devices;
>>
>> Exactly what you said. I have 20 pools and 2 backup devices with my 2
>> drive 24 slot autochanger.
>
> Wh
>> Why would you ever want such a pool? The only reason I can think
>> of is if
>> you have more pools than backup devices;
>
> Exactly what you said. I have 20 pools and 2 backup devices with my 2
> drive 24 slot autochanger.
Why so many pools? Are you doing one per client?
>> but that's the
> Why would you ever want such a pool? The only reason I can think of is if
> you have more pools than backup devices;
Exactly what you said. I have 20 pools and 2 backup devices with my 2
drive 24 slot autochanger.
> but that's the opposite of the
> problem I'm trying to solve. I have more bac
>> You do not understand idea of scratch pool. this pool is literally
>> speaking
>> some kind of trash for volumes that were recycled. you cannot use
>> volumes in
>> scratch pool. they are grabbed from it and placed to the pool which
>> needs new
>> media so adding new storage for scratch p
> You do not understand idea of scratch pool. this pool is literally speaking
> some kind of trash for volumes that were recycled. you cannot use volumes in
> scratch pool. they are grabbed from it and placed to the pool which needs new
> media so adding new storage for scratch pool is senseless fo
> You do not understand idea of scratch pool. this pool is literally speaking
> some kind of trash for volumes that were recycled. you cannot use volumes in
> scratch pool. they are grabbed from it and placed to the pool which needs new
> media so adding new storage for scratch pool is senseless fo
You do not understand idea of scratch pool. this pool is literally speaking
some kind of trash for volumes that were recycled. you cannot use volumes in
scratch pool. they are grabbed from it and placed to the pool which needs new
media so adding new storage for scratch pool is senseless for me.
> I'm having trouble with scratch pools. I have a three main backup
> pools configured in Bacula (Desktops, Infrastructure, Servers). Each
> corresponds to a separate RAID device (disk0, disk1, disk2), for disk-
> to-disk backups. I have added a fourth RAID device (disk3) which I
> want to act a
Hi Bacula Users,
I'm having trouble with scratch pools. I have a three main backup
pools configured in Bacula (Desktops, Infrastructure, Servers). Each
corresponds to a separate RAID device (disk0, disk1, disk2), for disk-
to-disk backups. I have added a fourth RAID device (disk3) which I
16 matches
Mail list logo
