Re: [Bacula-users] Differential backup with old timestamps

2012-11-07 Thread Martin Simmons
> On Wed, 24 Oct 2012 00:27:59 -0700, trexman said: > > Ok, here is the log output: > > 28-Okt 23:56 uxepv21-dir JobId 618: Created new Volume "Voltestjob-Diff-3722" > in catalog. > 28-Okt 23:56 uxepv21-dir JobId 618: Using Device "testjob" > 23-Okt 03:42 uxepv21-fd JobId 618: Warning: DIR

Re: [Bacula-users] Differential backup with old timestamps

2012-10-26 Thread Jürgen Echter
Am 26.10.2012 12:14, schrieb trexman: > Has nobody any idea? > > +-- > |This was sent by supp...@haiberg.com via Backup Central. > |Forward SPAM to ab...@backupcentral.com. > +---

[Bacula-users] Differential backup with old timestamps

2012-10-26 Thread trexman
Has nobody any idea? +-- |This was sent by supp...@haiberg.com via Backup Central. |Forward SPAM to ab...@backupcentral.com. +-- --

[Bacula-users] Differential backup with old timestamps

2012-10-24 Thread trexman
Ok, here is the log output: 28-Okt 23:56 uxepv21-dir JobId 618: Created new Volume "Voltestjob-Diff-3722" in catalog. 28-Okt 23:56 uxepv21-dir JobId 618: Using Device "testjob" 23-Okt 03:42 uxepv21-fd JobId 618: Warning: DIR and FD clocks differ by -508431 seconds, FD automatically compensating.

[Bacula-users] Differential backup with old timestamps

2012-10-24 Thread trexman
Ok, here is the log output: 28-Okt 23:56 uxepv21-dir JobId 618: Created new Volume "Volmsepv11-Diff-3722" in catalog. 28-Okt 23:56 uxepv21-dir JobId 618: Using Device "msepv11" 23-Okt 03:42 uxepv21-fd JobId 618: Warning: DIR and FD clocks differ by -508431 seconds, FD automatically compensating.

Re: [Bacula-users] Differential backup with old timestamps

2012-10-23 Thread Martin Simmons
> On Tue, 23 Oct 2012 07:02:52 -0700, trexman said: > > no, don't use Accurate=yes. And all timestamps are in the past. > > Any ideas? Please post the job definitions and the log output. __Martin -- Everyone hates

[Bacula-users] Differential backup with old timestamps

2012-10-23 Thread trexman
Hi, no, don't use Accurate=yes. And all timestamps are in the past. Any ideas? +-- |This was sent by supp...@haiberg.com via Backup Central. |Forward SPAM to ab...@backupcentral.com. +

Re: [Bacula-users] Differential backup with old timestamps

2012-10-22 Thread Martin Simmons
> On Mon, 22 Oct 2012 11:54:17 +0200, "JÜrgen Ecker" said: > > following situation: if i run a full backup, everything run fine, but if i > run after a fullbackup an differential backup, bacula backups data witch > timestamp haven't changed. Thats a big problem, because bacula backups > arb

[Bacula-users] Differential backup with old timestamps

2012-10-22 Thread Jürgen Ecker
Hi, following situation: if i run a full backup, everything run fine, but if i run after a fullbackup an differential backup, bacula backups data witch timestamp haven't changed. Thats a big problem, because bacula backups arbitrary data, so that i have sometimes 50GB differental backups 10 min