Piotr Gbyliczek wrote:
> On Sunday 14 December 2008 04:52:50 Devin Reade wrote:
>
>> If you have clients that are not on the same network as one of the
>> SD interfaces (or if you have clients with dumb resolvers that won't
>> do result record sorting based on connected interfaces), then you may
On Sunday 14 December 2008 04:52:50 Devin Reade wrote:
> I assume that NAT is not part of the picture?
No, there's no NAT.
> If I understand your topology correctly, it is analagous to my own
> where my SD is multi-homed to take advantage of the switched 1GB
> backbone without saturating the rou
Piotr Gbyliczek wrote:
> I'm having problem with configuring bacula properly. We have one director,
> three storages and lot of clients. Clients are in different networks, so we
> need to use different IP to connect from client to storage and different IP
> to connect from director to storage.
On Thursday 11 December 2008 13:10:14 you wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Dec 2008 09:43:47 +, Piotr Gbyliczek wrote:
> > We have one director,
> > three storages and lot of clients. Clients are in different networks, so
> > we need to use different IP to connect from client to storage and
> > different IP
On Thu, 11 Dec 2008 09:43:47 +, Piotr Gbyliczek wrote:
> We have one director,
> three storages and lot of clients. Clients are in different networks, so we
> need to use different IP to connect from client to storage and different IP
> to connect from director to storage.
Why is that? In a
Hi
I'm having problem with configuring bacula properly. We have one director,
three storages and lot of clients. Clients are in different networks, so we
need to use different IP to connect from client to storage and different IP
to connect from director to storage. I know that there is a way o
