Re: [Bacula-users] Default pool in the Automated Disk Backup example

2010-02-15 Thread Martin Simmons
> On Mon, 15 Feb 2010 07:19:48 -0500, John Drescher said: > > > The catalog backup always contains the whole database, so there should be no > > need to keep old copies of it.  Therefore, a pool with two volumes that > > recycle frequently might work best, without using much more disk space. >

Re: [Bacula-users] Default pool in the Automated Disk Backup example

2010-02-15 Thread John Drescher
> The catalog backup always contains the whole database, so there should be no > need to keep old copies of it.  Therefore, a pool with two volumes that > recycle frequently might work best, without using much more disk space. > There is one reason for this. A few years ago I had my bacula databas

Re: [Bacula-users] Default pool in the Automated Disk Backup example

2010-02-15 Thread Martin Simmons
> On Sat, 13 Feb 2010 20:31:27 +0100, hontvari at flyordie.com said: > > There is an example configuration in the Automated Disk Backup section > of the documentation, see here: > > http://www.bacula.org/5.0.x-manuals/en/main/main/Automated_Disk_Backup.html > > The BackupCatalog job refers

[Bacula-users] Default pool in the Automated Disk Backup example

2010-02-13 Thread Hontvári József
There is an example configuration in the Automated Disk Backup section of the documentation, see here: http://www.bacula.org/5.0.x-manuals/en/main/main/Automated_Disk_Backup.html The BackupCatalog job refers to the Default pool, which is not defined anywhere. How this should be corrected? Of co