On 2/26/07, John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2007-02-26, Kern Sibbald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > As always, thanks :-)
>
> No problem. I have now uploaded the 2.0.2 docs as well.
>
> -- John
John, any chance to see some day the backport for the 2.0.x ?
(and BTW, thanks A LOT for t
On 2007-02-26, Kern Sibbald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As always, thanks :-)
No problem. I have now uploaded the 2.0.2 docs as well.
-- John
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Te
As always, thanks :-)
On Saturday 24 February 2007 16:59, John Goerzen wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Debian packages of Bacula 2.0.2 have been uploaded to Debian
> experimental and should hit your local mirror within 24 hours.
>
> These packages will eventually be uploaded to unstable when I feel that
> the
On Sat, Feb 24, 2007 at 10:40:30PM +0100, Lech Karol Paw??aszek wrote:
> >Debian packages of Bacula 2.0.2 have been uploaded to Debian
> >experimental and should hit your local mirror within 24 hours.
> [...]
>
> Beautiful. Do packages include "fixed"[1] version of restore.c?
>
> [1] -
> http://
John Goerzen napisał(a):
> Hello,
>
> Debian packages of Bacula 2.0.2 have been uploaded to Debian
> experimental and should hit your local mirror within 24 hours.
[...]
Beautiful. Do packages include "fixed"[1] version of restore.c?
[1] -
http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_id=
Hello,
Debian packages of Bacula 2.0.2 have been uploaded to Debian
experimental and should hit your local mirror within 24 hours.
These packages will eventually be uploaded to unstable when I feel that
they're solid enough to do so. (Also we must wait a bit due to an
unrelated propogation to te
