Re: [Bacula-users] Debian Postgres security update to 13.17 broke bacula

2024-11-19 Thread Josip Deanovic via Bacula-users
On Tuesday, November 19, 2024 9:56:18 PM CET Sobel-Sorenson, Chandler - (scar) wrote: > Josip Deanovic via Bacula-users wrote on 11/18/24 11:35 AM: > > check the availability of the server resources > > check the logs of the Postgres service > > check the database connection parameters > > Everyt

Re: [Bacula-users] Debian Postgres security update to 13.17 broke bacula

2024-11-19 Thread Sobel-Sorenson, Chandler - (scar)
Josip Deanovic via Bacula-users wrote on 11/18/24 11:35 AM: > check the availability of the server resources > check the logs of the Postgres service > check the database connection parameters Everything checked out, so I restarted all the bacula services.  Everything is running fine again!  I gu

[Bacula-users] Debian Postgres security update to 13.17 broke bacula

2024-11-18 Thread Sobel-Sorenson, Chandler - (scar)
It seems there was a medium security update released for postgresql-13 on Debian bookworm (oldstable), and right after that bacula stopped working due to "no connection to the server".  For example, got this e-mail about the catalog backup: > 15-Nov 20:36 hind-dir JobId 0: Fatal error: bdb.h:143 b

Re: [Bacula-users] Debian Postgres security update to 13.17 broke bacula

2024-11-18 Thread Josip Deanovic via Bacula-users
On Monday, November 18, 2024 6:57:30 PM CET Sobel-Sorenson, Chandler - (scar) wrote: > It seems there was a medium security update released for postgresql-13 > on Debian bookworm (oldstable), and right after that bacula stopped > working due to "no connection to the server". For example, got this