Ryan Novosielski wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Did you just remove compression from the definition?
I simply commented out the compression option in the FileSet section.
### FILESETS
FileSet {
Name = "Web6"
Include {
Options {
signature =
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Did you just remove compression from the definition?
I'm still looking for a way to EXPLICITLY disable compression.
DAve wrote:
> Thomas Traeger wrote:
>>> Excellent point. The servers that are slowest to transfer are also the
>>> busiest, my front
Thomas Traeger wrote:
>> Excellent point. The servers that are slowest to transfer are also the
>> busiest, my front end web server and my mail gateways (Av and spam
>> filtering).
>>
>> That is certainly something to look further into. I could try turning
>> off compression for one cycle to pro
> Excellent point. The servers that are slowest to transfer are also the
> busiest, my front end web server and my mail gateways (Av and spam
> filtering).
>
> That is certainly something to look further into. I could try turning
> off compression for one cycle to prove the theory.
>
> Thanks,
On 11/10/06, DAve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
pedro moreno wrote:> On 11/10/06, Ryan Novosielski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE->> Hash: SHA1>>
>> DAve wrote:>> > Good morning,>> > I'm not sure how to interpret the variation in rates. I don't think I>> > have a prob
pedro moreno wrote:
> On 11/10/06, Ryan Novosielski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> DAve wrote:
>> > Good morning,
>> > I'm not sure how to interpret the variation in rates. I don't think I
>> > have a problem, though I would expect the backup
On 11/10/06, Ryan Novosielski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-Hash: SHA1DAve wrote:> Good morning,> I'm not sure how to interpret the variation in rates. I don't think I> have a problem, though I would expect the backups across the 1gb network
> to be far faster than th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
DAve wrote:
> Good morning,
> I'm not sure how to interpret the variation in rates. I don't think I
> have a problem, though I would expect the backups across the 1gb network
> to be far faster than they are. The backups across the 1gb network are
>
John Drescher wrote:
> On 11/10/06, DAve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Good morning,
>>
>> I have a question concerning reported data transfer rates between the
>> clients and the storage servers. All the above servers are connected to
>> my NOC clients via a 1gb network. The servers are connect
On 11/10/06, DAve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Good morning,I have a question concerning reported data transfer rates between theclients and the storage servers. All the above servers are connected tomy NOC clients via a 1gb network. The servers are connected to several
other clients via 100mb networ
Good morning,
I have a question concerning reported data transfer rates between the
clients and the storage servers. All the above servers are connected to
my NOC clients via a 1gb network. The servers are connected to several
other clients via 100mb network and a 13mb VLAN.
Data rates for bac
11 matches
Mail list logo
