> On Thu, 10 Dec 2009 17:09:59 -0600, Brian Clarkson said:
>
> Is there a way to paginate the response from these list commands? I
> have 37k entries in this pool ...
Not within Bacula, but you can use the @output command in bconsole:
@output /tmp/out.txt
list media pool=Default
@output
a
Is there a way to paginate the response from these list commands? I
have 37k entries in this pool ...
On Thu, 2009-12-10 at 17:38 -0500, John Drescher wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 5:09 PM, Brian Clarkson wrote:
> > On Thu, 2009-12-10 at 16:11 -0500, John Drescher wrote:
> >> On Thu, De
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 5:09 PM, Brian Clarkson wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-12-10 at 16:11 -0500, John Drescher wrote:
>> On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 3:53 PM, Brian Clarkson wrote:
>> > On Thu, 2009-12-10 at 15:06 -0500, John Drescher wrote:
>> >> >> Make the volume retention much longer. And then apply th
On Thu, 2009-12-10 at 16:11 -0500, John Drescher wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 3:53 PM, Brian Clarkson wrote:
> > On Thu, 2009-12-10 at 15:06 -0500, John Drescher wrote:
> >> >> Make the volume retention much longer. And then apply that to all of
> >> >> your volumes.
> >> >
> >> > Wouldn't the
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 3:53 PM, Brian Clarkson wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-12-10 at 15:06 -0500, John Drescher wrote:
>> >> Make the volume retention much longer. And then apply that to all of
>> >> your volumes.
>> >
>> > Wouldn't the volume retention period need to be shorter?
>> >
>>
>> Retention pe
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 3:06 PM, John Drescher wrote:
>>> Make the volume retention much longer. And then apply that to all of
>>> your volumes.
>>
>> Wouldn't the volume retention period need to be shorter?
>>
>
> Retention period is how long to keep the volume before it can be reused.
>
Bacula
>> Make the volume retention much longer. And then apply that to all of
>> your volumes.
>
> Wouldn't the volume retention period need to be shorter?
>
Retention period is how long to keep the volume before it can be reused.
John
--
On Thu, 2009-12-10 at 11:34 -0500, John Drescher wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 10:43 AM, Brian Clarkson wrote:
> > I've re-read the section on volume retention and volume recycling but
> > I'm still confused.
> >
> > My backup files are being reused even though my director is configured
> > to
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 10:43 AM, Brian Clarkson wrote:
> I've re-read the section on volume retention and volume recycling but
> I'm still confused.
>
> My backup files are being reused even though my director is configured
> to create new files. Backups are working on schedule but my secondary,
I've re-read the section on volume retention and volume recycling but
I'm still confused.
My backup files are being reused even though my director is configured
to create new files. Backups are working on schedule but my secondary,
rsync-based backup is failing because the filenames and filesizes
10 matches
Mail list logo
