Thanks; I suspected that would eventually be the case.
On 10/22/2015 8:24 PM, Heitor Faria wrote:
>> I am running Bacula 5.2.6 on Debian 8.1. My backups are disk-based.
>>
>> I have a local primary backup server and a remote secondary backup
>> server. The secondary is intended to contain copies
> I am running Bacula 5.2.6 on Debian 8.1. My backups are disk-based.
>
> I have a local primary backup server and a remote secondary backup
> server. The secondary is intended to contain copies of the backups on
> the primary. Each is running its own storage daemon, which, according
> to the
I am running Bacula 5.2.6 on Debian 8.1. My backups are disk-based.
I have a local primary backup server and a remote secondary backup
server. The secondary is intended to contain copies of the backups on
the primary. Each is running its own storage daemon, which, according
to the documentat
