Re: [Bacula-users] Concurrent Backups with a Virtual Autochanger

2014-11-18 Thread Brady, Mike
On 2014-11-19 12:46, Ana Emília M. Arruda wrote: > Hi Mike, > > On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 5:53 PM, Brady, Mike > wrote: > >> On 2014-11-19 08:52, Ana Emília M. Arruda wrote: > Do you have "prefer mounted volumes" set to no in your jobs > definition? It is recommended if you are using multi

Re: [Bacula-users] Concurrent Backups with a Virtual Autochanger

2014-11-18 Thread Ana Emília M . Arruda
Hi Mike, On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 5:53 PM, Brady, Mike wrote: > On 2014-11-19 08:52, Ana Emília M. Arruda wrote: > >>> Do you have "prefer mounted volumes" set to no in your jobs > >>> definition? It is recommended if you are using multiple devices > >>> and > >>> one pool. > >> > >> I do not hav

Re: [Bacula-users] Concurrent Backups with a Virtual Autochanger

2014-11-18 Thread Brady, Mike
On 2014-11-19 08:52, Ana Emília M. Arruda wrote: >>> Do you have "prefer mounted volumes" set to no in your jobs >>> definition? It is recommended if you are using multiple devices >>> and >>> one pool. >> >> I do not have this set because of the warnings against it in both >> the manual and one o

Re: [Bacula-users] Concurrent Backups with a Virtual Autochanger

2014-11-18 Thread Ana Emília M . Arruda
On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 4:47 PM, Brady, Mike wrote: > On 2014-11-16 05:36, Ana Emília M. Arruda wrote: > >> Hi Mike, >> >> Despite that the white paper tell us about having "Maximum Concurrent >> Jobs = 1" in device configuration. I think this could make sense when >> using stand alone devices in

Re: [Bacula-users] Concurrent Backups with a Virtual Autochanger

2014-11-18 Thread Brady, Mike
On 2014-11-16 05:36, Ana Emília M. Arruda wrote: > Hi Mike, > > Despite that the white paper tell us about having "Maximum Concurrent > Jobs = 1" in device configuration. I think this could make sense when > using stand alone devices in a group as you have in the white papers. > When using autocha

Re: [Bacula-users] Concurrent Backups with a Virtual Autochanger

2014-11-18 Thread Brady, Mike
On 2014-11-16 02:12, Josh Fisher wrote: > On 11/14/2014 6:17 PM, Brady, Mike wrote: >> First of all thanks to Kern and Bacula Systems for making the "Best >> Practices for Disk Based Backup" and "Disk Back Design" documents >> available. >> >> I have been playing around with the best way for doing

Re: [Bacula-users] Concurrent Backups with a Virtual Autochanger

2014-11-15 Thread Ana Emília M . Arruda
Hi Mike, Despite that the white paper tell us about having "Maximum Concurrent Jobs = 1" in device configuration. I think this could make sense when using stand alone devices in a group as you have in the white papers. When using autochangers, it is much better you use the "Maximum Concurrent Jobs

Re: [Bacula-users] Concurrent Backups with a Virtual Autochanger

2014-11-15 Thread Josh Fisher
On 11/14/2014 6:17 PM, Brady, Mike wrote: > First of all thanks to Kern and Bacula Systems for making the "Best > Practices for Disk Based Backup" and "Disk Back Design" documents > available. > > I have been playing around with the best way for doing concurrent > backups for a while and these docu

Re: [Bacula-users] Concurrent Backups with a Virtual Autochanger

2014-11-15 Thread Brady, Mike
On 2014-11-15 20:45, Kern Sibbald wrote: > Unfortunately, I no longer have the time to help people debug usage > problems, which I actually enjoy doing, but the other users on this > Bacula email list should be able to help you resolve this. I do have a > few remarks: > Thanks for taking the time

Re: [Bacula-users] Concurrent Backups with a Virtual Autochanger

2014-11-14 Thread Kern Sibbald
Unfortunately, I no longer have the time to help people debug usage problems, which I actually enjoy doing, but the other users on this Bacula email list should be able to help you resolve this. I do have a few remarks: 1. There is no reason to set the VolumePoolInterval to anything other than th

Re: [Bacula-users] Concurrent Backups with a Virtual Autochanger

2014-11-14 Thread Brady, Mike
On 2014-11-15 12:17, Brady, Mike wrote: > First of all thanks to Kern and Bacula Systems for making the "Best > Practices for Disk Based Backup" and "Disk Back Design" documents > available. > > I have been playing around with the best way for doing concurrent > backups for a while and these docum

[Bacula-users] Concurrent Backups with a Virtual Autochanger

2014-11-14 Thread Brady, Mike
First of all thanks to Kern and Bacula Systems for making the "Best Practices for Disk Based Backup" and "Disk Back Design" documents available. I have been playing around with the best way for doing concurrent backups for a while and these documents have helped my understanding considerably.