Re: [Bacula-users] Compile on XP Instructions. (64 bit offer)

2005-10-26 Thread Martin Simmons
> On Wed, 26 Oct 2005 18:21:56 +0200, Kern Sibbald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: Kern> On Wednesday 26 October 2005 18:14, Russell Howe wrote: >> Mark Bober wrote: >> > As an addendum to this; I've access to Win64 machines, and any version of >> > Visual Studio necessary. >> > >> > I'd

Re: [Bacula-users] Compile on XP Instructions. (64 bit offer)

2005-10-26 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Wednesday 26 October 2005 18:14, Russell Howe wrote: > Mark Bober wrote: > > As an addendum to this; I've access to Win64 machines, and any version of > > Visual Studio necessary. > > > > I'd offer some time in running a compile (I'm totally oblivious about V > > Studio, however) but looking thr

Re: [Bacula-users] Compile on XP Instructions. (64 bit offer)

2005-10-26 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Wednesday 26 October 2005 18:02, Mark Bober wrote: > As an addendum to this; I've access to Win64 machines, and any version of > Visual Studio necessary. > > I'd offer some time in running a compile (I'm totally oblivious about V > Studio, however) but looking through the README.vc8 on VS 2005,

Re: [Bacula-users] Compile on XP Instructions. (64 bit offer)

2005-10-26 Thread Russell Howe
Mark Bober wrote: > > As an addendum to this; I've access to Win64 machines, and any version of > Visual Studio necessary. > > I'd offer some time in running a compile (I'm totally oblivious about V > Studio, however) but looking through the README.vc8 on VS 2005, it doesn't > quite look like

[Bacula-users] Compile on XP Instructions. (64 bit offer)

2005-10-26 Thread Mark Bober
As an addendum to this; I've access to Win64 machines, and any version of Visual Studio necessary. I'd offer some time in running a compile (I'm totally oblivious about V Studio, however) but looking through the README.vc8 on VS 2005, it doesn't quite look like all the support libraries are a