> 1) i'm not still sure is a compatibility trouble.
I reply to myself, because still i don't think is a 'compatibility' trouble,
and, as st.paul 'lightned' in the road to damasco, i've understood.
Storage daemons are effectively some virtualization hosts (Proxmox), and
have two addresses, one
Mandi! Gary R. Schmidt
In chel di` si favelave...
> I'm still running old FDs - 3.0.3 on some AIX boxes being the oldest -
> talking to a 9.4.2 DIR/SD on Solaris 11.3, and all is good.
Ah! Also 3.X?! Cool... i think i was using old software... ;-)
> How much RAM is on your server, and how ar
Mandi! Phil Stracchino
In chel di` si favelave...
> Is it *feasible* to install enough of a local development environment on
> these legacy servers to locally compile a 7.x client for them?
Sure, i can try to ''backport'' bacula debian packages and deploy on these
servers but... first... how c
On 23/06/2022 02:39, Marco Gaiarin wrote:
I'm setting up a Bacula installation for a set of servers, using debian
buster package (9.4.2-2+deb10u1) for director and storage daemons.
All works as expected until we use file daemon versions 7+, but some very
old servers that have bacula 5.0 or 5.2
On 6/22/22 16:51, Marco Gaiarin wrote:
Mandi! Phil Stracchino
In chel di` si favelave...
The first and most obvious question here is: Is there some sound
technical reason why you have not updated the file daemons on those
servers to something at least moderately recent?
Never hear of 'leg
Mandi! Phil Stracchino
In chel di` si favelave...
> The first and most obvious question here is: Is there some sound
> technical reason why you have not updated the file daemons on those
> servers to something at least moderately recent?
Never hear of 'legacy systems'?! ;-)
These are a bunc
On 6/22/22 12:39, Marco Gaiarin wrote:
I'm setting up a Bacula installation for a set of servers, using debian
buster package (9.4.2-2+deb10u1) for director and storage daemons.
All works as expected until we use file daemon versions 7+, but some very
old servers that have bacula 5.0 or 5.2 doe
I'm setting up a Bacula installation for a set of servers, using debian
buster package (9.4.2-2+deb10u1) for director and storage daemons.
All works as expected until we use file daemon versions 7+, but some very
old servers that have bacula 5.0 or 5.2 does not work.
Communication works as exp