Re: [Bacula-users] Coexistence of Bacula Bat 5.2.10 and Bacula Director 5.2.12

2013-09-21 Thread Kern Sibbald
On 09/19/2013 10:35 AM, Ralf Brinkmann wrote: > We are using now Bacula on Linux servers for years with great success. > > On Windows clients we start Bat via Putty and XMing. > > Now I found on SourceForge there is a "Bat" for Windows available - > unfortunately a little bit outdated. > > Is it sa

Re: [Bacula-users] Coexistence of Bacula Bat 5.2.10 and Bacula Director 5.2.12

2013-09-19 Thread Ralf Brinkmann
Am 19.09.2013 13:58, schrieb John Drescher: > On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 4:35 AM, Ralf Brinkmann > mailto:ralf.brinkm...@wemhoener.de>> wrote: > Is it save to use a Bat version 5.2.10 on the Windows side with Bacula > version 5.2.12 or 5.2.13 on the Linux server side? > Yes. I have done this

Re: [Bacula-users] Coexistence of Bacula Bat 5.2.10 and Bacula Director 5.2.12

2013-09-19 Thread John Drescher
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 4:35 AM, Ralf Brinkmann wrote: > We are using now Bacula on Linux servers for years with great success. > > On Windows clients we start Bat via Putty and XMing. > > Now I found on SourceForge there is a "Bat" for Windows available - > unfortunately a little bit outdated. >

[Bacula-users] Coexistence of Bacula Bat 5.2.10 and Bacula Director 5.2.12

2013-09-19 Thread Ralf Brinkmann
We are using now Bacula on Linux servers for years with great success. On Windows clients we start Bat via Putty and XMing. Now I found on SourceForge there is a "Bat" for Windows available - unfortunately a little bit outdated. Is it save to use a Bat version 5.2.10 on the Windows side with Bac