It's not necessary to perforate the firewall for using a VPN as long as you are
initiating the connection from within the firewall perimeter. This can be done
with OpenVPN easily. You will need a box - not dedicated but always on - inside
your LAN though, that instantiates the tunnel endpoint.
On 8/15/2010 9:38 AM, Dan Langille wrote:
> On 8/14/2010 5:20 PM, Markus Lanz wrote:
>
>> I don't know. Can openvpn really help in my case?? Remember, i cannot open
>> or even forward a port on the router where the clients are hidden behind?
>> Wouldn't i have to set up a site to site VPN from on
On 8/15/2010 9:38 AM, Dan Langille wrote:
> Do a simple test: from the client, assuming your SD is at 10.0.0.1 and
> listening on port 9103:
>
> telnet 10.0.0.1 9103
>
> You should see this:
>
> $ telnet 10.55.0.67 9103
> Trying 10.55.0.67...
> Connected to ngaio.unixathome.org.
> Escape chara
On 8/14/2010 5:20 PM, Markus Lanz wrote:
> I don't know. Can openvpn really help in my case?? Remember, i cannot open or
> even forward a port on the router where the clients are hidden behind?
> Wouldn't i have to set up a site to site VPN from one router to the other
> either, if i could acces
Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Sat, 14 Aug 2010 18:27:23 -0400
> Von: Phil Stracchino
> An: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Betreff: Re: [Bacula-users] Client in LAN, Server in the Internet
> On 08/14/10 17:20, Markus Lanz wrote:
> > I don't know.
On 08/14/10 17:20, Markus Lanz wrote:
> I don't know. Can openvpn really help in my case?? Remember, i cannot
> open or even forward a port on the router where the clients are
> hidden behind? Wouldn't i have to set up a site to site VPN from one
> router to the other either, if i could access the
Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Sat, 14 Aug 2010 15:26:30 -0400
> Von: Dan Langille
> An: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Betreff: Re: [Bacula-users] Client in LAN, Server in the Internet
> On 8/14/2010 1:56 PM, Phil Stracchino wrote:
> > On 08/14/10 13:
On 8/14/2010 1:56 PM, Phil Stracchino wrote:
> On 08/14/10 13:16, Markus Lanz wrote:
>>> On 08/11/10 18:00, Markus Lanz wrote:
Hi
Is it possible to have the server in the internet and the client in the
>>> LAN? The client would be behind the firewall and not directly reachable by
>>>
On 08/14/10 13:16, Markus Lanz wrote:
>> On 08/11/10 18:00, Markus Lanz wrote:
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> Is it possible to have the server in the internet and the client in the
>> LAN? The client would be behind the firewall and not directly reachable by
>> the server. Only the client can reach the server dir
> On 08/11/10 18:00, Markus Lanz wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > Is it possible to have the server in the internet and the client in the
> LAN? The client would be behind the firewall and not directly reachable by
> the server. Only the client can reach the server directly?
> >
> > I'm asking because the
On 08/11/10 18:00, Markus Lanz wrote:
> Hi
>
> Is it possible to have the server in the internet and the client in the LAN?
> The client would be behind the firewall and not directly reachable by the
> server. Only the client can reach the server directly?
>
> I'm asking because there are some
Hi
Is it possible to have the server in the internet and the client in the LAN?
The client would be behind the firewall and not directly reachable by the
server. Only the client can reach the server directly?
I'm asking because there are some backup programms where the server is
initiating the
12 matches
Mail list logo
