El Viernes 18 Noviembre 2005 12:09, Craig White escribió:
> Looking to install on CentOS 4
>
> I see 1.38.0-1 rpms for RHEL 3 and other rh/fc versions.
>
> Should I just install 1.31 from tarball or get source rpm and rebuild?
Rebuilding the src.rpm works just fine.
--
("\''/").__..-''"`-. .
White
Sent: Friday, November 18, 2005 10:10 AM
To: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Bacula-users] CentOS 4
Looking to install on CentOS 4
I see 1.38.0-1 rpms for RHEL 3 and other rh/fc versions.
Should I just install 1.31 from tarball or get source rpm and rebuild?
Craig
--
This
Looking to install on CentOS 4
I see 1.38.0-1 rpms for RHEL 3 and other rh/fc versions.
Should I just install 1.31 from tarball or get source rpm and rebuild?
Craig
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
-
Hello,
I have uploaded bacula-1.36.2-4.src.rpm to sourceforge. This contains
explicit build support for RHEL4 (I think) and CentOS 4. Build support
for x86_64 has also been added. Test builds have been done on CentOS but
not RHEL4.
Build with one of these 3 commands:
rpmbuild --rebuild \
