Re: [Bacula-users] Can't access tape device after upgrade from v2.4.4-1 to 5.0.2-1

2010-07-19 Thread Rory Campbell-Lange
On 19/07/10, Dan Langille (d...@langille.org) wrote: > >My objective, foolishly ommitted from my email, is to start from scratch > >after the upgrade. I have now managed to do so by using the brute force > >method to relabel the tapes as the catalogues from my tests failed to > >follow from 2.4.4 t

Re: [Bacula-users] Can't access tape device after upgrade from v2.4.4-1 to 5.0.2-1

2010-07-19 Thread Dan Langille
On 7/19/2010 10:06 AM, Rory Campbell-Lange wrote: > Hi Dan > > Thanks for your email. > > On 19/07/10, Dan Langille (d...@langille.org) wrote: >> On 7/19/2010 4:21 AM, Rory Campbell-Lange wrote: >> Oh your tapes should still be usable after the upgrade. I think >> you need to concentrate on th

Re: [Bacula-users] Can't access tape device after upgrade from v2.4.4-1 to 5.0.2-1

2010-07-19 Thread Rory Campbell-Lange
Hi Dan Thanks for your email. On 19/07/10, Dan Langille (d...@langille.org) wrote: > On 7/19/2010 4:21 AM, Rory Campbell-Lange wrote: > Oh your tapes should still be usable after the upgrade. I think > you need to concentrate on that problem first. Ignore all others. > > >Is the best thing

Re: [Bacula-users] Can't access tape device after upgrade from v2.4.4-1 to 5.0.2-1

2010-07-19 Thread Dan Langille
On 7/19/2010 4:21 AM, Rory Campbell-Lange wrote: > On 18/07/10, John Drescher (dresche...@gmail.com) wrote: >>> # btape -pv /dev/nst0 >>> >>> ? ?Tape block granularity is 1024 bytes. >>> ? ?btape: butil.c:284 Using device: "/dev/nst0" for writing. >>> ? ?18-Jul 22:27 btape JobId 0: 3301 Issuing aut

Re: [Bacula-users] Can't access tape device after upgrade from v2.4.4-1 to 5.0.2-1

2010-07-19 Thread Rory Campbell-Lange
On 18/07/10, John Drescher (dresche...@gmail.com) wrote: > > # btape -pv /dev/nst0 > > > > ? ?Tape block granularity is 1024 bytes. > > ? ?btape: butil.c:284 Using device: "/dev/nst0" for writing. > > ? ?18-Jul 22:27 btape JobId 0: 3301 Issuing autochanger "loaded? drive 0" > > command. > > ? ?18-

Re: [Bacula-users] Can't access tape device after upgrade from v2.4.4-1 to 5.0.2-1

2010-07-18 Thread John Drescher
> Late last week I had my first run at Bacula on a Linux server with > self-contained storage and an LT04 16 slot tape library (a Dell PV-124T) > connected by a SAS controller. I ran 2.4.4-1 as it was the default under > Debian > stable. After a few dry runs and problems I succeeded in backing up

[Bacula-users] Can't access tape device after upgrade from v2.4.4-1 to 5.0.2-1

2010-07-18 Thread Rory Campbell-Lange
Late last week I had my first run at Bacula on a Linux server with self-contained storage and an LT04 16 slot tape library (a Dell PV-124T) connected by a SAS controller. I ran 2.4.4-1 as it was the default under Debian stable. After a few dry runs and problems I succeeded in backing up just over 2