I have labeled them manually and then ran update slots scan.
Arunav.
> Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 17:10:31 -0500
> Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula writing to wrong volume
> From: dresche...@gmail.com
> To: di...@hotmail.com
> CC: hei...@bacula.com.br; bacula-users@lists.sourcefo
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 5:02 PM, Arunav Mandal wrote:
> All 5 tapes were new and never being written.
>
I expected that. When you ran label barcodes it probably ordered them
in the same way it ran the backups.
Look at the mediaids versus label.
John
-
On 01/12/2011 05:14 PM, John Drescher wrote:
> 2011/1/12 Arunav Mandal:
>> I am using Bacula 5.0.3 and I have five tape named LTO-001 to LTO-005. After
>> LTO-001 is full bacula is selecting up tape in random and not LTO-002.
>>
>> How can I force bacula to go by serially when selecting tapes? I st
All 5 tapes were new and never being written.
Arunav.
> Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 18:27:18 -0300
> From: hei...@bacula.com.br
> To: dresche...@gmail.com; di...@hotmail.com
> CC: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula writing to wrong volume
>
2011/1/12 Arunav Mandal :
> I am using Bacula 5.0.3 and I have five tape named LTO-001 to LTO-005. After
> LTO-001 is full bacula is selecting up tape in random and not LTO-002.
>
> How can I force bacula to go by serially when selecting tapes? I started up
> all five new tapes marked as Append.
>
I am using Bacula 5.0.3 and I have five tape named LTO-001 to LTO-005. After
LTO-001 is full bacula is selecting up tape in random and not LTO-002.
How can I force bacula to go by serially when selecting tapes? I started up all
five new tapes marked as Append.
Arunav.
