Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula project management and feature requests

2005-11-11 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Thursday 10 November 2005 22:17, Arno Lehmann wrote: > Hi, > > what do we call this now? RFC? RFF? RTDAATARFC (Request To Discuss An > Addition To A Request For Comment)? Feature Request > > anyway... I personally like RFC, because for me RFC means Request For Change and it is used in this

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula project management and feature requests

2005-11-10 Thread Arno Lehmann
Hi, what do we call this now? RFC? RFF? RTDAATARFC (Request To Discuss An Addition To A Request For Comment)? anyway... On 08.11.2005 15:19, Kern Sibbald wrote: ... Concerning future development of Bacula: As I noted in the 1.38 ReleaseNotes, version 1.38 was different from prior versions b

[Bacula-users] Bacula project management and feature requests

2005-11-08 Thread Kern Sibbald
Hello, A word about 1.38.0: Release 1.38.0 is evolving much as prior releases, that is to say, once people started to use it, we received a number of bug reports, some rather important. All the critical, serious, and important bugs have been fixed and if you want a copy, you can pull it from th