On 6/10/11 3:18 PM, Gabriele Bulfon wrote:
> I understand this may sound a bit wary, but: what are the benefits of using
> Bacula on a ZFS storage
> rather than using Amanda or ZFS send bare utilities?
>
> I know Bacula supports ZFS acls, but we also understand the faster option of
> zfs sending.
I understand this may sound a bit wary, but: what are the benefits of using
Bacula on a ZFS storage
rather than using Amanda or ZFS send bare utilities?
I know Bacula supports ZFS acls, but we also understand the faster option of
zfs sending.
We also know zfs sending is not optimal for single fil
