Hello,
W dniu 10 czerwca 2011 13:55 użytkownik napisał:
>
> Good morning Radoslaw,
>
> I have several different versions... so I can't say you nothing as a
> rule so you think any major version of bat can be used to access any
> minor of bacula-dir?
>
I.E. if you have a Bacula 3.0.3 then yo
On Fri, 10 Jun 2011 09:43:27 +0200, Radosław Korzeniewski wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 2011/6/10
>
>> Thanks a lot for you're response. So, it's not recommended to
>> use a
>> version of bat with inferior or superior version bacula
>> services?. It's
>> better to use the own shipped version with each so
Hi,
2011/6/10
>Thanks a lot for you're response. So, it's not recommended to use a
> version of bat with inferior or superior version bacula services?. It's
> better to use the own shipped version with each source version?.
>
>
What Bacula version do you use - 2.x, 3.x, 4.x, 5.x - all, som
On Thu, 9 Jun 2011 11:54:19 -0400, John Drescher wrote:
>> Wich Bat (bacula admin tool) should I have for use with each
>> bacula-dir
>> (isn't it the service it connects to?)?. Is there a matrix of
>> compatibilities or similar?. I have had some problems compiling bat
>> in
>> Solaris for e
> Wich Bat (bacula admin tool) should I have for use with each bacula-dir
> (isn't it the service it connects to?)?. Is there a matrix of
> compatibilities or similar?. I have had some problems compiling bat in
> Solaris for example... so I'm planning having one central BAT for
> accessing all
Good afternoon all,
Wich Bat (bacula admin tool) should I have for use with each bacula-dir
(isn't it the service it connects to?)?. Is there a matrix of
compatibilities or similar?. I have had some problems compiling bat in
Solaris for example... so I'm planning having one central BAT for
