Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula Recycling process

2016-03-14 Thread Santiago Díaz Soler
El 14/03/16 a las 21:16, Santiago Díaz Soler escribió: > > > El 14/03/16 a las 20:43, John Drescher escribió: >>> Although not your problem (since DRC202L5 was written yesterday), I >>> see that you have a 7 day retention period on these volumes. Not the >>> 60 that is in your config. >> >> Remem

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula Recycling process

2016-03-14 Thread Santiago Díaz Soler
El 14/03/16 a las 20:43, John Drescher escribió: >> Although not your problem (since DRC202L5 was written yesterday), I >> see that you have a 7 day retention period on these volumes. Not the >> 60 that is in your config. > > Remember that when you change retention periods in the config files > t

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula Recycling process

2016-03-14 Thread John Drescher
> Although not your problem (since DRC202L5 was written yesterday), I > see that you have a 7 day retention period on these volumes. Not the > 60 that is in your config. Remember that when you change retention periods in the config files this applies to new volumes only. To get it to apply to exi

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula Recycling process

2016-03-14 Thread John Drescher
On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 4:53 PM, Santiago Díaz Soler wrote: > Hi, everyone > > I'm facing a weird issue on a bacula instance over Debian 8 (jessie). > I have a pool with two volumes and everytime that a volume is marked as > "recycle" (14 days) bacula sets InChanger and Slot values to 0. Also, th

[Bacula-users] Bacula Recycling process

2016-03-14 Thread Santiago Díaz Soler
Hi, everyone I'm facing a weird issue on a bacula instance over Debian 8 (jessie). I have a pool with two volumes and everytime that a volume is marked as "recycle" (14 days) bacula sets InChanger and Slot values to 0. Also, the volume that was marked as Used gets the InChanger and Slot values