Здравствуйте, Alan.
Вы писали 21 сентября 2006 г., 18:15:32:
AB> On Thu, 21 Sep 2006, Vadim A. Umanski wrote:
>> But the mail server data can be compressed approx. 50% and I wouldn't
>> like to spend unneeded space ... Full backup would take about 80-90 GB
>> of raw data.
AB> Assuming you hav
On Thu, 21 Sep 2006, Vadim A. Umanski wrote:
> But the mail server data can be compressed approx. 50% and I wouldn't
> like to spend unneeded space ... Full backup would take about 80-90 GB
> of raw data.
Assuming you have a "modern" tape drive (anything more recent than last
10 years), then h
Perhaps you could NFS mount the mail server's disk on the bacula server,
then use the local backup server's fd to back it up with compression.
j
On Thu, 21 Sep 2006, Bill Moran wrote:
> In response to "Vadim A. Umanski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > Здравствуйте, bacula-users.
> >
> > Dear colleag
In response to "Vadim A. Umanski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Здравствуйте, bacula-users.
>
> Dear colleagues, an advice needed.
>
> I've got a mail server, the BackUp solution is Bacula 1.38.9.
>
> I've got a lot of data on Accounts disk slice, and the mail server's
> CPU is not too strong (UltraSP
Здравствуйте, bacula-users.
Dear colleagues, an advice needed.
I've got a mail server, the BackUp solution is Bacula 1.38.9.
I've got a lot of data on Accounts disk slice, and the mail server's
CPU is not too strong (UltraSPARC II 450 MHz) and Full backup takes
3-4 times more when GZip option is