Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula GZip question

2006-09-21 Thread Vadim A. Umanski
Здравствуйте, Alan. Вы писали 21 сентября 2006 г., 18:15:32: AB> On Thu, 21 Sep 2006, Vadim A. Umanski wrote: >> But the mail server data can be compressed approx. 50% and I wouldn't >> like to spend unneeded space ... Full backup would take about 80-90 GB >> of raw data. AB> Assuming you hav

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula GZip question

2006-09-21 Thread Alan Brown
On Thu, 21 Sep 2006, Vadim A. Umanski wrote: > But the mail server data can be compressed approx. 50% and I wouldn't > like to spend unneeded space ... Full backup would take about 80-90 GB > of raw data. Assuming you have a "modern" tape drive (anything more recent than last 10 years), then h

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula GZip question

2006-09-21 Thread Jeff LaCoursiere
Perhaps you could NFS mount the mail server's disk on the bacula server, then use the local backup server's fd to back it up with compression. j On Thu, 21 Sep 2006, Bill Moran wrote: > In response to "Vadim A. Umanski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > Здравствуйте, bacula-users. > > > > Dear colleag

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula GZip question

2006-09-21 Thread Bill Moran
In response to "Vadim A. Umanski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Здравствуйте, bacula-users. > > Dear colleagues, an advice needed. > > I've got a mail server, the BackUp solution is Bacula 1.38.9. > > I've got a lot of data on Accounts disk slice, and the mail server's > CPU is not too strong (UltraSP

[Bacula-users] Bacula GZip question

2006-09-21 Thread Vadim A. Umanski
Здравствуйте, bacula-users. Dear colleagues, an advice needed. I've got a mail server, the BackUp solution is Bacula 1.38.9. I've got a lot of data on Accounts disk slice, and the mail server's CPU is not too strong (UltraSPARC II 450 MHz) and Full backup takes 3-4 times more when GZip option is