Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula GDB traceback of bacula-sd

2010-10-14 Thread Martin Simmons
> On Thu, 14 Oct 2010 11:59:10 +0200, Frank Altpeter said: > > It looks like you could be right with that. Currently the process is > quite large. "top" reports: > > Mem: 3743792k total, 3641244k used, 102548k free,20448k buffers > Swap: 10490404k total, 115120k used, 10375284k fre

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula GDB traceback of bacula-sd

2010-10-14 Thread Frank Altpeter
Moin, sorry to respond so lately, but there was much work these days :-) 2010/10/6 Martin Simmons : >> On Wed, 6 Oct 2010 11:36:33 +0200, Frank Altpeter said: >> >> I just hit a segmentation fault with my bacula installation. I hope >> someone can help me how to get this fixed. > > The actual

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula GDB traceback of bacula-sd

2010-10-06 Thread Bruno Friedmann
Hi Frank, also don't hesitate to install the suggested -debuginfo package show by zypper. They will help in obtaining full and complete trace or linked so On 10/06/2010 11:36 AM, Frank Altpeter wrote: > Hi list, > > I just hit a segmentation fault with my bacula installation. I hope > someone c

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula GDB traceback of bacula-sd

2010-10-06 Thread Martin Simmons
> On Wed, 6 Oct 2010 11:36:33 +0200, Frank Altpeter said: > > I just hit a segmentation fault with my bacula installation. I hope > someone can help me how to get this fixed. The actual error was "Resource temporarily unavailable" but it is being reported with level M_ABORT so you get the seg

[Bacula-users] Bacula GDB traceback of bacula-sd

2010-10-06 Thread Frank Altpeter
Hi list, I just hit a segmentation fault with my bacula installation. I hope someone can help me how to get this fixed. This happened now the second time within a week, so I think there might be a bug in the sd code. Environmental information: Version: 5.0.3 (04 August 2010) OS: SUSE Linux Ente