Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula For Mac Clients

2021-02-24 Thread Radosław Korzeniewski
Hello, śr., 24 lut 2021 o 12:42 Josh Fisher napisał(a): > On 2/24/21 5:14 AM, Radosław Korzeniewski wrote: > > Hello, > > wt., 23 lut 2021 o 21:29 David Brodbeck > napisał(a): > >> >> >> On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 11:50 PM Radosław Korzeniewski < >> rados...@korzeniewski.net> wrote: >> >>> The new

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula For Mac Clients

2021-02-24 Thread Josh Fisher
On 2/24/21 5:14 AM, Radosław Korzeniewski wrote: Hello, wt., 23 lut 2021 o 21:29 David Brodbeck > napisał(a): On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 11:50 PM Radosław Korzeniewski mailto:rados...@korzeniewski.net>> wrote: The newest Bacula Clients should use

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula For Mac Clients

2021-02-24 Thread Radosław Korzeniewski
Hello, wt., 23 lut 2021 o 21:29 David Brodbeck napisał(a): > > > On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 11:50 PM Radosław Korzeniewski < > rados...@korzeniewski.net> wrote: > >> The newest Bacula Clients should use kIOPMAssertionTypeNoIdleSleep with >> kIOPMAssertionLevelOn to prevent OS from sleeping. So exte

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula For Mac Clients

2021-02-23 Thread David Brodbeck
On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 11:50 PM Radosław Korzeniewski < rados...@korzeniewski.net> wrote: > The newest Bacula Clients should use kIOPMAssertionTypeNoIdleSleep with > kIOPMAssertionLevelOn to prevent OS from sleeping. So external hacks should > not be required any more. :) > > best regards > -- >

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula For Mac Clients

2021-02-23 Thread Radosław Korzeniewski
Hello, wt., 23 lut 2021 o 01:23 David Brodbeck napisał(a): > > > On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 12:49 PM wrote: > >> >> To address this and many of the great suggestions, which we're very >> appreciative of, we're now trying to use Homebrew to build its formula for >> Bacula using 9.0.x and we hope to

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula For Mac Clients

2021-02-22 Thread David Brodbeck
On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 12:49 PM wrote: > > To address this and many of the great suggestions, which we're very > appreciative of, we're now trying to use Homebrew to build its formula for > Bacula using 9.0.x and we hope to then use the build-pkg package to create > a package we can use. We're h

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula For Mac Clients

2021-02-16 Thread Josh Fisher
On 2/15/21 2:14 PM, Martin Simmons wrote: On Fri, 12 Feb 2021 17:47:52 -0500, Josh Fisher said: On 2/12/21 12:53 PM, Martin Simmons wrote: I don't understand the comment about "refactor" or "all instances" unless there are other errors as well. By refactor, he means that when the function

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula For Mac Clients

2021-02-15 Thread Martin Simmons
> On Fri, 12 Feb 2021 17:47:52 -0500, Josh Fisher said: > > On 2/12/21 12:53 PM, Martin Simmons wrote: > > > > > I don't understand the comment about "refactor" or "all instances" unless > > there are other errors as well. > > > By refactor, he means that when the function declaration is ch

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula For Mac Clients

2021-02-12 Thread Josh Fisher
On 2/12/21 12:53 PM, Martin Simmons wrote: On Thu, 11 Feb 2021 13:28:31 -0800, jmaness said: On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 12:54 PM Josh Fisher wrote: On 2/11/21 12:40 PM, jman...@engineering.ucsb.edu wrote: Hello! About two years ago our Bacula client package stopped working in Catalina

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula For Mac Clients

2021-02-12 Thread jmaness
On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 12:07 PM Robert Adesam wrote: > Hej! > > j> "j" == jmaness writes: > > j> Thank you very much for this suggestion. We'll look into that. Our > j> main concern is that our director is set to version 9.0.6 as that's > j> what Enterprise Linux seems to have pegged the versi

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula For Mac Clients

2021-02-12 Thread Robert Adesam
Hej! j> "j" == jmaness writes: j> Thank you very much for this suggestion. We'll look into that. Our j> main concern is that our director is set to version 9.0.6 as that's j> what Enterprise Linux seems to have pegged the version to. Homebrew j> wants to compile version 11 so we're going to loo

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula For Mac Clients

2021-02-12 Thread Martin Simmons
> On Thu, 11 Feb 2021 13:28:31 -0800, jmaness said: > > On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 12:54 PM Josh Fisher wrote: > > > > > On 2/11/21 12:40 PM, jman...@engineering.ucsb.edu wrote: > > > > Hello! > > > > About two years ago our Bacula client package stopped working in > > Catalina. We've fig

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula For Mac Clients

2021-02-12 Thread jmaness
On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 6:43 PM Phil Stracchino wrote: > On 2/11/21 12:40 PM, jman...@engineering.ucsb.edu wrote: > > Hello! > > > > About two years ago our Bacula client package stopped working in > > Catalina. We've figured out that the binaries were compiled for PPC and > > i386 Macs and

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula For Mac Clients

2021-02-12 Thread Josh Fisher
On 2/12/21 5:26 AM, Radosław Korzeniewski wrote: Hello, czw., 11 lut 2021 o 22:29 > napisał(a): On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 12:54 PM Josh Fisher mailto:jfis...@jaybus.com>> wrote: On 2/11/21 12:40 PM, jman...@engineering.ucsb.edu

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula For Mac Clients

2021-02-12 Thread Radosław Korzeniewski
Hello, czw., 11 lut 2021 o 22:29 napisał(a): > > > On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 12:54 PM Josh Fisher wrote: > >> >> On 2/11/21 12:40 PM, jman...@engineering.ucsb.edu wrote: >> >> Hello! >> >> About two years ago our Bacula client package stopped working in >> Catalina. We've figured out that th

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula For Mac Clients

2021-02-11 Thread Phil Stracchino
On 2/11/21 12:40 PM, jman...@engineering.ucsb.edu wrote: > Hello! > >      About two years ago our Bacula client package stopped working in > Catalina. We've figured out that the binaries were compiled for PPC and > i386 Macs and I suspect the issue is that we need a client for x86_64 or > ia64. >

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula For Mac Clients

2021-02-11 Thread jmaness
On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 12:54 PM Josh Fisher wrote: > > On 2/11/21 12:40 PM, jman...@engineering.ucsb.edu wrote: > > Hello! > > About two years ago our Bacula client package stopped working in > Catalina. We've figured out that the binaries were compiled for PPC and > i386 Macs and I suspect

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula For Mac Clients

2021-02-11 Thread Josh Fisher
On 2/11/21 12:40 PM, jman...@engineering.ucsb.edu wrote: Hello!      About two years ago our Bacula client package stopped working in Catalina. We've figured out that the binaries were compiled for PPC and i386 Macs and I suspect the issue is that we need a client for x86_64 or ia64.      

[Bacula-users] Bacula For Mac Clients

2021-02-11 Thread jmaness
Hello! About two years ago our Bacula client package stopped working in Catalina. We've figured out that the binaries were compiled for PPC and i386 Macs and I suspect the issue is that we need a client for x86_64 or ia64. The official documentation points us to Fink which doesn't seem