Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula 9.4 and 9.6 compatibility...

2025-05-02 Thread Marco Gaiarin
Mandi! Sven Hartge In chel di` si favelave... > The "live" backports repository is disabled and archived for any release > that is moved to the LTS stage, so no wonder you could not find anything > on there. Thanks for the info. Anyway, for a sake of completeness, at the end i've simply put

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula 9.4 and 9.6 compatibility...

2025-04-26 Thread Sven Hartge
On 26.04.25 09:58, Marco Gaiarin wrote: Mandi! Sven Hartge In chel di` si favelave... There was a Debian-Backports package for Buster for 9.6.7, availabe still via https://snapshot.debian.org/package/bacula/9.6.7-3~bpo10%2B1/#bacula-sd_9.6.7-3:7e:bpo10:2b:1 That will install cleanly without

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula 9.4 and 9.6 compatibility...

2025-04-26 Thread Marco Gaiarin
Mandi! Martin Simmons In chel di` si favelave... > In general, you need the versions of the director and storage to be the same. > Anything else is untested. OK. Because of 'catalog datbase format remains unchanged' i hoped that DIR<->SD compatibility could/would be a 'major version only' thing

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula 9.4 and 9.6 compatibility...

2025-04-26 Thread Marco Gaiarin
Mandi! Sven Hartge In chel di` si favelave... > There was a Debian-Backports package for Buster for 9.6.7, availabe still via > https://snapshot.debian.org/package/bacula/9.6.7-3~bpo10%2B1/#bacula-sd_9.6.7-3:7e:bpo10:2b:1 > That will install cleanly without the need for manual compilation. Uh!

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula 9.4 and 9.6 compatibility...

2025-04-25 Thread Sven Hartge
On 25.04.25 20:39, Martin Simmons wrote: I think your simplest option is to build Bacula 9.6.7 yourself on the buster machines so you can upgrade all machines to that version before doing any OS upgrades. There was a Debian-Backports package for Buster for 9.6.7, availabe still via https://s

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula 9.4 and 9.6 compatibility...

2025-04-25 Thread Martin Simmons
The catalog compatibility just means you don't need to update the catalog when you upgrade the director. That doesn't help with compatibility between the director and storage daemons, which is mainly affected by the communication between them. In general, you need the versions of the director and

[Bacula-users] Bacula 9.4 and 9.6 compatibility...

2025-04-22 Thread Marco Gaiarin
I need to do a rather complex server upgrade, from debian buster to debian bookworm (really: from PVE 6 to PVE 8). Buster have bacula 9.4.2, bullseye and bookworm have 9.6.7. Looking at bacula 9.6 release notes i catch: The catalog datbase format remains unchanged from the 9.4.4 relea