> On Jan 16, 2015, at 11:41 AM, Kern Sibbald wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> If you do not already have an answer, please read the release notes.
> They explain that Bacula version 7 attempts to list only unique SD
> names, because any duplicate names will produce exactly the same
> listing. If you want
Hello,
If you do not already have an answer, please read the release notes.
They explain that Bacula version 7 attempts to list only unique SD
names, because any duplicate names will produce exactly the same
listing. If you want the old behavior, you can get it -- I forget the
details, but they
> On Jan 14, 2015, at 2:29 AM, Eric Bollengier
> wrote:
>
> Hello Dan,
>
>
> On 14/01/2015 01:58, Dan Langille wrote:
>>
>> If they all have distinct values for Address, it works. If not, one or more
>> Storage are silently ignored.
>>
>
> You are right, some users have many Storage resou
Hello Dan,
On 14/01/2015 01:58, Dan Langille wrote:
>
> If they all have distinct values for Address, it works. If not, one or more
> Storage are silently ignored.
>
You are right, some users have many Storage resources in their
configuration, and now, by default, bacula is trying to list onl
I tried upgrading from Bacula 5 to Bacula 7 today on FreeBSD 9.3 with
PostgreSQL 9.4
However, running status storage, I'm missing a storage.
Theory: bacula-dir is not properly treating all Storage resources with the same
Address.
If they all have distinct values for Address, it works. If not,
