>I always compile from source on production Solaris 9 & 10 machines.
I learned my lesson ages ago with doing such things on with
distros that utilize a package manager (even though Solaris 10's is
worth sh!t). From that day forward I try my hardest to always use the
package manager, and it looks l
Alan Brown wrote:
> On Wed, 9 Sep 2009, mehma sarja wrote:
>
>
>> The user community should make an effort to offer pre-compiled fd's and sd's
>> for various OSes. I was in the same dilemma.
>>
>
> The user community DOES make an effort to do this.
>
> If they don't exist then noone runni
On Wed, 9 Sep 2009, mehma sarja wrote:
> The user community should make an effort to offer pre-compiled fd's and sd's
> for various OSes. I was in the same dilemma.
The user community DOES make an effort to do this.
If they don't exist then noone running your OS has gotten around to it.
Why not
An: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Betreff: Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula 3.0.2 Packages for Solaris and OpenSolaris
>The user community should make an effort to offer pre-compiled fd's and sd's
>for various OSes. I was in the same dilemma.
Did you just manually compile
>The user community should make an effort to offer pre-compiled fd's and sd's
>for various OSes. I was in the same dilemma.
Did you just manually compile the whole thing?
--
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Fre
The user community should make an effort to offer pre-compiled fd's and sd's
for various OSes. I was in the same dilemma.
Yudhvir
===
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 6:50 PM, Joseph L. Casale
wrote:
> Anyone know of existing Bacula 3.0.2 packages for these
> two distros?
>
> Blastwaves are old and I don't
Anyone know of existing Bacula 3.0.2 packages for these
two distros?
Blastwaves are old and I don't want to compile from source
on these production machines.
Thanks,
jlc
--
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free
