On Tue, 20 Mar 2007, Arno Lehmann wrote:
> I'll add my results here - they seem to fit :-)
>
> Bad luck, Alan: I can't get a static FD even under SuSE 8.1. Seems to be
> some problem with the acl library. I tried to disable ACLS during
> configure, but --disable-acl was accepted but did not work.
On Tuesday 20 March 2007 14:15, Alan Brown wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Mar 2007, Kern Sibbald wrote:
>
> > What I don't understand is why you don't build your own current
(non-static)
> > version of Bacula on your older systems.
>
> Because in several cases they won't compile - lack of libraries, etc.
On Tuesday 20 March 2007 14:51, Arno Lehmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 3/20/2007 2:15 PM, Alan Brown wrote:
> > On Tue, 20 Mar 2007, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> >
> >> What I don't understand is why you don't build your own current
(non-static)
> >> version of Bacula on your older systems.
> >
> > Because
Hi,
On 3/20/2007 2:15 PM, Alan Brown wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Mar 2007, Kern Sibbald wrote:
>
>> What I don't understand is why you don't build your own current (non-static)
>> version of Bacula on your older systems.
>
> Because in several cases they won't compile - lack of libraries, etc.
>
> Thes
On Tue, 20 Mar 2007, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> What I don't understand is why you don't build your own current (non-static)
> version of Bacula on your older systems.
Because in several cases they won't compile - lack of libraries, etc.
These are old boxes and they're "frozen" - no updates of core s
On Tuesday 20 March 2007 11:12, Alan Brown wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Mar 2007, Arno Lehmann wrote:
>
> > Ok, I have an FD for SuSE 9.2 which should also work on SLES9.
> > Statically linking was not possible, after some playing around, I always
> > ended up with:
>
> > I can not find static .a librarie
On Tue, 20 Mar 2007, Arno Lehmann wrote:
> Ok, I have an FD for SuSE 9.2 which should also work on SLES9.
> Statically linking was not possible, after some playing around, I always
> ended up with:
> I can not find static .a libraries for linux-gate (whatever that is) and
> libattr, so I assume t
Hi,
On 3/19/2007 11:14 AM, Alan Brown wrote:
> On Sat, 17 Mar 2007, Kern Sibbald wrote:
>
Has anyone built a bacula-fd for suse-9 at all?
>>> Yes. No rpms here, though.
>>>
>>> I'm quite sure someone else will have an rpm soon for the FD at least.
>> Hopefully the above is true, but if I rec
On Sat, 17 Mar 2007, Kern Sibbald wrote:
>>> Has anyone built a bacula-fd for suse-9 at all?
>>
>> Yes. No rpms here, though.
>>
>> I'm quite sure someone else will have an rpm soon for the FD at least.
>
> Hopefully the above is true, but if I recall correctly, the Bacula project
> (i.e. Scott) i
On Friday 16 March 2007 12:45, Arno Lehmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 3/14/2007 11:30 AM, Alan Brown wrote:
> > On Tue, 13 Mar 2007, Xeos Laenor wrote:
> >
> >> Congratulations to him (and surely the others) and thanks a lot to
you ;-)
> >> Great Job guys !
> >
> > Seconded.
> >
> > Has anyone built
On Fri, 16 Mar 2007, Arno Lehmann wrote:
>> Has anyone built a bacula-fd for suse-9 at all?
>
> Yes. No rpms here, though.
All I need is a bacula-fd-static...
Thanks
AB
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of I
Hi,
On 3/14/2007 11:30 AM, Alan Brown wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Mar 2007, Xeos Laenor wrote:
>
>> Congratulations to him (and surely the others) and thanks a lot to you ;-)
>> Great Job guys !
>
> Seconded.
>
> Has anyone built a bacula-fd for suse-9 at all?
Yes. No rpms here, though.
I'm quite sur
On Tue, 13 Mar 2007, Xeos Laenor wrote:
> Congratulations to him (and surely the others) and thanks a lot to you ;-)
> Great Job guys !
Seconded.
Has anyone built a bacula-fd for suse-9 at all?
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash.
Congratulations to him (and surely the others) and thanks a lot to you ;-)
Great Job guys !
Franck
2007/3/13, Felix Schwarz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Fedora {5,6} + EL 4 RPMs are released, too.
Please note that there are efforts getting bacula into mainline Fedora.
Andreas
Thienemann did a great
Fedora {5,6} + EL 4 RPMs are released, too.
Please note that there are efforts getting bacula into mainline Fedora. Andreas
Thienemann did a great job there. I think that these RPMs (once accepted in
Fedora) will find their way into Enterprise Extras which is good news to all EL
users out ther
Bacula 2.0.3-1 released for SuSE 10.1 and 10.2 (x86_64) - see
sourceforge.net rpms-contrib-psheaffer or (soon to be) the sbarnin repo.
Thanks,
PattiMichelle
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForg
16 matches
Mail list logo
