Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula 1.38.11 and symlink

2008-01-09 Thread Rich
On 2008.01.09. 18:11, Ryan Novosielski wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Arunav Mandal wrote: >> Restore is not creating the symlinks. > > I have not tested this. Boy, that could be ugly. Anyone have any insight? i missed the original thread, but i can tell that 1.36.1

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula 1.38.11 and symlink

2008-01-09 Thread Ryan Novosielski
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Arunav Mandal wrote: > Restore is not creating the symlinks. I have not tested this. Boy, that could be ugly. Anyone have any insight? - -- _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ |Y#| | | |\/| | \ |\ | | |Ryan Novosielski - Systems Programmer II |$&| |__|

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula 1.38.11 and symlink

2008-01-09 Thread Arunav Mandal
> Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2008 4:44 AM > To: Arunav Mandal > Cc: bacula-users > Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula 1.38.11 and symlink > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Arunav Mandal wrote: > > I am running Bacula version 1.38.11 in both DIR a

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula 1.38.11 and symlink

2008-01-08 Thread Ryan Novosielski
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Arunav Mandal wrote: > I am running Bacula version 1.38.11 in both DIR and FD and it seems > symlinks are not backed up. Is there any option that I need to enable in > config’s to make it happen? By "does not back up symlinks", do you mean that a rest

[Bacula-users] Bacula 1.38.11 and symlink

2008-01-08 Thread Arunav Mandal
I am running Bacula version 1.38.11 in both DIR and FD and it seems symlinks are not backed up. Is there any option that I need to enable in config’s to make it happen? Thx in advance, Arunav. - Check out the new S