* Beren Gamble ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Has anyone got Bacula 1.38 working on Redhat Advanced Server 2.1 or 3?
>
> It complains to me about not having a late enough version of glibc.
>
> On 2.1 I tried to compile the latest version of glibc, but it says I need a=
> newer version of
Hi,
Has anyone got Bacula 1.38 working on Redhat Advanced Server 2.1 or 3?
It complains to me about not having a late enough version of glibc.
On 2.1 I tried to compile the latest version of glibc, but it says I need a
newer version of gcc... and probably god knows what else.
Is there an easie
