On 11 Dec 2006 at 17:05, Bill Moran wrote:
> In response to "Shaun T. Erickson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > Does the latest stable release of Bacula work ok on FreeBSD 6.x? Is
> > there anything special I need to know about bacula and this version of
> > FreeBSD?
>
> Nothing that I've come across
On 11 Dec 2006 at 17:03, Shaun T. Erickson wrote:
> Does the latest stable release of Bacula work ok on FreeBSD 6.x? Is
> there anything special I need to know about bacula and this version of
> FreeBSD?
It should. I've tested it a few times on 6.2-PRERELEASE during this
BETA phase.
--
Dan La
In response to "Shaun T. Erickson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Does the latest stable release of Bacula work ok on FreeBSD 6.x? Is
> there anything special I need to know about bacula and this version of
> FreeBSD?
Nothing that I've come across. I've got four separate directors running
on 6.X and a w
Does the latest stable release of Bacula work ok on FreeBSD 6.x? Is
there anything special I need to know about bacula and this version of
FreeBSD?
--
-ste
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join So
