On Monday 24 July 2006 12:05, Mindaugas wrote:
>
> > If you get this to work using a single SD with an Address name that is
> > resolved differently on the Director and on the Client, please let me
> know.
> > It is always conforting to have a confirmation of something that we put in
> > the manua
On Monday 24 July 2006 12:05, Mindaugas wrote:
>
> > If you get this to work using a single SD with an Address name that is
> > resolved differently on the Director and on the Client, please let me
> know.
> > It is always conforting to have a confirmation of something that we put in
> > the manua
On 7/24/06, Kern Sibbald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If you get this to work using a single SD with an Address name that is
> resolved differently on the Director and on the Client, please let me know.
> It is always conforting to have a confirmation of something that we put in
> the manual.
>
I
> If you get this to work using a single SD with an Address name that is
> resolved differently on the Director and on the Client, please let me
know.
> It is always conforting to have a confirmation of something that we put in
> the manual.
Works for me with Bacula server on 4 LANs.
But sti
On Monday 24 July 2006 08:43, MaxxAtWork wrote:
> On 7/22/06, Kern Sibbald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > That old trick will no longer work with Bacula 1.38.x at least not if you
are
> > using an autochanger. It relied on the fact that Bacula only supported a
> > single autochanger and thus ne
On 7/22/06, Kern Sibbald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That old trick will no longer work with Bacula 1.38.x at least not if you are
> using an autochanger. It relied on the fact that Bacula only supported a
> single autochanger and thus never kept track of it. In 1.38.x Bacula works
> with multip
On Friday 21 July 2006 10:18, MaxxAtWork wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm planning to configure my backup environment so that most of the
> server-fd's can access the storage daemon via regular Intranet, but a
> couple of them, with higher backup requirements, would use instead a
> private (gigabit?) backup
Hello,
I'm planning to configure my backup environment so that most of the server-fd's
can access the storage daemon via regular Intranet, but a couple of them, with
higher backup requirements, would use instead a private (gigabit?)
backup-LAN that
is connected to the server-sd&dir via a second NI
