Philipp Geschke writes:
> Hi,
>
> Matthew King schrieb:
>> I see that encryption of data is working (or at least it's written and
>> compiles) in bacula's SVN repository.
>>
>> Is this version of bacula (3.0 or 2.5 by the way?) likely to become
>> stable soon, or if not, is backporting the encry
Steve Polyack wrote:
> Dan Langille wrote:
>> Philipp Geschke wrote:
>>
>>
>>> After that you will have a bacula-fd installed that is able to perform data
>>> and transport encryption.
>>>
>> FD encryption is cool and all. But I'd like to see SD-side encryption.
>>
>>
> I have to agree
Dan Langille wrote:
> Philipp Geschke wrote:
>
>
>> After that you will have a bacula-fd installed that is able to perform data
>> and transport encryption.
>>
>
> FD encryption is cool and all. But I'd like to see SD-side encryption.
>
>
I have to agree; I even put in a feature reques
Philipp Geschke wrote:
> After that you will have a bacula-fd installed that is able to perform data
> and transport encryption.
FD encryption is cool and all. But I'd like to see SD-side encryption.
--
Dan Langille
BSDCan - The Technical BSD Conference : http://www.bsdcan.org/
PGCon - The
Hi,
Matthew King schrieb:
> I see that encryption of data is working (or at least it's written and
> compiles) in bacula's SVN repository.
>
> Is this version of bacula (3.0 or 2.5 by the way?) likely to become
> stable soon, or if not, is backporting the encryption into 2.4 likely to
> be a mamm
I see that encryption of data is working (or at least it's written and
compiles) in bacula's SVN repository.
Is this version of bacula (3.0 or 2.5 by the way?) likely to become
stable soon, or if not, is backporting the encryption into 2.4 likely to
be a mammoth task not worth the effort?
I would
