> On Tue, 3 Apr 2012 17:23:10 +0200, Ward Poelmans said:
>
> On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 16:14, Martin Simmons wrote:
> >> On Tue, 3 Apr 2012 09:39:48 -0400, John Drescher said:
> >>
> >> > Well, from the docs: "The Volume Retention record defines the length
> >> > of time that Bacula will gua
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 16:14, Martin Simmons wrote:
>> On Tue, 3 Apr 2012 09:39:48 -0400, John Drescher said:
>>
>> > Well, from the docs: "The Volume Retention record defines the length
>> > of time that Bacula will guarantee that the Volume is not reused
>> > counting from the time the last
> On Tue, 3 Apr 2012 09:39:48 -0400, John Drescher said:
>
> > Well, from the docs: "The Volume Retention record defines the length
> > of time that Bacula will guarantee that the Volume is not reused
> > counting from the time the last job stored on the Volume terminated."
>
> That is correc
> Well, from the docs: "The Volume Retention record defines the length
> of time that Bacula will guarantee that the Volume is not reused
> counting from the time the last job stored on the Volume terminated."
That is correct.
> It also doesn't make sense to recycle as soon as the job no longer
>
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 15:17, John Drescher wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 9:01 AM, Ward Poelmans wrote:
>> volume is thus marked as 'used'. From the docs, I though this meant
>> that the volumes are kept for a period of 1 year before being pruned
>> and reused. However, now 6 months have passe
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 9:01 AM, Ward Poelmans wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm rather new to bacula: i've worked with it for 6 months now. But
> now, there is happening something which I do not understand: Automatic
> Volume Recycling. I've got a client with a job retention of 6 months
> with autoprune on. It
Hi,
I'm rather new to bacula: i've worked with it for 6 months now. But
now, there is happening something which I do not understand: Automatic
Volume Recycling. I've got a client with a job retention of 6 months
with autoprune on. It writes to a pool (File storage) with a volume
retention of 1 yea
Hello,
>From what I've read in the archives, this is a tricky subject. I've
regularly had issues with this in the past, and have stumbled upon a few
threads that deal with it. That, coupled with some unholy kludges (such
as disabling the /Enabled/ field for volumes I wanted left alone) has
gotten
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 2:28 PM, ganiuszka wrote:
>
>
> John M. Drescher wrote:
>>
>> Volume retention does not start until a volume is marked Full or Used.
>> Then the time of last written is used to compute the retention period.
>>
> I agree.
> So I have one more question. In which volume states
John M. Drescher wrote:
>
> Volume retention does not start until a volume is marked Full or Used.
> Then the time of last written is used to compute the retention period.
>
I agree.
So I have one more question. In which volume states (VolStatus) a volume can
be prune in the automatic volume re
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 9:21 AM, ganiuszka wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> I have some question about automatic volume recycling described in Bacula
> documentation (Chapter 10).
>
> I can't understand why a volume with VolStatus=Append may be pruned (and
> later recycled) because I seems that the Volume Reten
Hi!
I have some question about automatic volume recycling described in Bacula
documentation (Chapter 10).
I can't understand why a volume with VolStatus=Append may be pruned (and
later recycled) because I seems that the Volume Retention period don't begin
count down when the VolStatus is "Append
Am Freitag April 14 2006 09:26 schrieb Kern Sibbald:
> Please permit me to complain a bit: you would get far better answers if you
> always include the essentials of your setup. Please see the support page of
> www.bacula.org, but at a minimum the Bacula version is critcal.
I'm sorry that I forgot
Please permit me to complain a bit: you would get far better answers if you
always include the essentials of your setup. Please see the support page of
www.bacula.org, but at a minimum the Bacula version is critcal.
On Thursday 13 April 2006 09:07, Thomas Sturm wrote:
> The recycling of used vol
The recycling of used volumes fails.
The retention is set to 2 days, but when the job starts (after 6 days without
using the tape), I get the following information:
Current Volume "Do_2-s8" not acceptable because:
1000 OK VolName=Do_2-s8 VolJobs=11 VolFiles=29 VolBlocks=358018
VolByte
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
My suspicion here is that your job retention is much longer than 2 days.
As such the tape will not roll over.
According to the manual, that is not the way things work and the
shortest retention period is used. However, I have found reality in this
ins
The recycling of used volumes fails.
The retention is set to 2 days, but when the job starts (after 6 days without
using the tape), I get the following information:
Current Volume "Do_2-s8" not acceptable because:
1000 OK VolName=Do_2-s8 VolJobs=11 VolFiles=29 VolBlocks=358018
VolByte
17 matches
Mail list logo
