Marek Simon wrote:
> Bacula is not intended to delete anything. The way you have a new volume
> for a new day with a new uniq date-based name is not a good way for
> bacula. You shuld have the volumes with generic names and recycle them
> instead of removing them (you do not destroy the tapes af
Marek Simon wrote:
> Phil Stracchino napsal(a):
>> I have a disk-based backup setup that uses dated volumes which are used
>> for a 23-hour period then marked 'used', so that I can be certain a
>> particular day's backups are contained in a single file. They are of
>> course purged after their ret
Bacula is not intended to delete anything. The way you have a new volume
for a new day with a new uniq date-based name is not a good way for
bacula. You shuld have the volumes with generic names and recycle them
instead of removing them (you do not destroy the tapes after one use
either).
Howev
"Phil Stracchino" kirjoitti viestissä
news:4b410543.8040...@metrocast.net...
>I have a disk-based backup setup that uses dated volumes which are used
> for a 23-hour period then marked 'used', so that I can be certain a
> particular day's backups are contained in a single file. They are of
> cou
Bacula don't delete the data,
you have to do it manually or with a script
You can add a 'post-script' in the job, or in the backup-catalog
Ciao,
Carlo
2010/1/3 Phil Stracchino
> I have a disk-based backup setup that uses dated volumes which are used
> for a 23-hour period then marked 'used',
I have a disk-based backup setup that uses dated volumes which are used
for a 23-hour period then marked 'used', so that I can be certain a
particular day's backups are contained in a single file. They are of
course purged after their retention time expires, at which time they are
moved to the Scr
